Re: Upgrading chisels
ThomD
>"I also know that there is something about Japanese chisels and about many users of Japanese chisels that doesn't have anything to do with their performance in cabinetmaking, and that to me seems to be totally beyond any attempt at rational analysis."
There is some truth to this. We all go through life hoping to have our prejudices comfrimed somehow. There is a kind of person who will instantly see th point to Birkenstock sandles or Juicing, and it defies rational analysis, at least any additional analysis. The flip side to that is that people are repelled for the same kinds of irrational reasons. Overall these opinions are should be ignored if you are looking for the truth of the mater.
There are an abundant number of very serious practitioners who have chosen Japanese tools including american workers in factory settings like guitar factories, or individuals working in their shops. It's ridiculous, most of the time, to suggest there is a necesarry superiority to Japanese tools that shows up in the work, but if you know anything about tool making and blacksmithing there does appear to be superiority in the tools. The are a lot of otherwise hard nosed Bubba type blacksmith who are enthraled with the Japanese art because it stands out.
"OTOH, the design, materials and manufacturing choices made by TLN translate directly and logically into superior performance in their use for joining fine hardwoods into fine furniture."
I agree with you 100%... except in their basic choice of the model of tools to emulate. They clearly chose the Stanley/Bailey simply because it was popular. Every choice they made in improving those planes is a solid choice, but the planes themselves are nuts. They are the off-ramp to power tools, and the bast@rd child of industrialization. I can't think of a single feature that makes them a superior tool "for joining fine hardwoods into fine furniture". LN rocks though.