WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Question......

Posts

Re: Question......

#26

Re: Question......

David Walser

I'm glad you were able to get the lathe quieted down. One of the things I like most about using the lathe is it is quiet compared to the other machinery I have in my shop. My lathe (not the HF), which isn't as old as yours, but is still fairly old having been made in the late 1990's, is so quiet I cannot tell it is on by the sound. The air thrown off by the spinning blank makes more noise than the lathe itself. As a consequence, turning can be an almost zen like experience.

Good luck and safe spinning!

Re: Question......

#27

Re: Question......

roger lance

since I have never worked on another lathe.....a modern lathe.....I don't know what I'm missing......

Re: Question......

#28

Only once in 32 years

Dick Coers

Did I want to lock the spindle from turning, when removing a chuck or faceplate was not involved. And that was to use the index pin to dovetail Shaker candle stand posts. The only other times I come close, is if I wanted to power sand something. But then I held it with one hand and sanded with the other. So you see my confusion about why you just want to randomly be able to lock the spindle.

Re: Question......

#29

once every 32 hours

John K Jordan

I lock the spindle quite a bit, sometimes when carving, sometimes sanding. Since the PM will only lock in two places I use the pin in the indexing holes to position it close to where I want to carve. There is no significant force on it so the indexing is fine for this.

I lock every time, of course when removing chucks with the wrench. I've got the metal slide that holds the spindle lock button down that I use on occasion.

JKJ

Re: Question......

#30

Ken Vaughan

Thanks for the trip down memory lane

Ken Vaughan

Thanks Roger!!!

I first learned to turn on one of those in Junior High. Nice to see one of those ladies cleaned up and used.

Appreciated your stirring up some good memories of a time long !ong ago, and far far away.

Re: Question......

#31

Re: Noise

Steve Criscenzo

You may find the it will run quieter with a quality rubber belt rather than a link belt. My first lathe had a Reeves drive and ran much better with a solid belt. Downside is getting it installed.

Steve

Re: Question......

#32

It makes me smile

Dick Coers

You know, for all of you romancing and praising that lathe. It's like praising a 1974 Pinto. A real POS car, made at the worst time in Detroit. Of course I already voiced my opinion, but just had to make this car analogy.

Re: Question......

#33

Re: Noise

roger lance

Steve.....if I remember correctly, I installed the link belt because it was said to run quieter/etc than a conventional solid belt.... :D

The install of a solid belt is not simple.....that's for sure.

Re: Question......

#34

Re: Thanks for the trip down memory lane

roger lance

Junior High shop class.....now that is long, long ago.....and far, far away.

Re: Question......

#35

Re: Noise

mikeee12345

If you have room in the head-stock install a spare belt on the spindle

and secure it out of the way if possible. When the belt finally lets go

and you look inside the head-stock and see the spare belt you will smile the rest of the day.

We do this on large industrial equipment when possible to save down time.

Re: Question......

#36

Re: Noise

roger lance

Now that's thinking ahead.....good idea.....thanks.

Re: Question......

#37

Re: Noise

Steve Criscenzo

Roger

My experience is that link belts work great with a solid pulley, especially a machined one. They did not work well on my reeves drive, likely due to the surface of the pulleys. I ended up going back to a high quality rubber belt and it made things run better.

Steve

Re: Question......

#38

Re: Noise

mikeee12345

The older reeves drives were made of better quality metals, many of the newer reeves drives

are made of cheaper "pot metals" which will not work well with link-belts. A quality rubber belt

shredding apart will often damage some of the cheaper reeves drives on the market today. That

has to be one of the weak links when working with reeves drive lathes. When one of the newer

reeves drives get sticky you need to be gentle with cleaning them and getting them working again.

Newbies will pry on the reeves pulleys with screwdrivers and pliers and usually breaker them on their

first rodeo.

Re: Question......

#39

Re: Noise

roger lance

Knock on wood.....I've been running that link belt for a few years now.....no issues.....and the noise level is acceptable; but, thats after a lot of efforts to cut down the things that are rattling.

Which brings us to the metal cabinet. This may well be the largest contributor to noise generation on this old style of lathe. Motor vibrations get amplified in/by that cabinet. There is currently a lot of padding here, there, and most anywhere to cut the clatter.

Re: Question......

#40

Pintos and lathes

John K Jordan

>>>It's like praising a 1974 Pinto.

I had a green 74 pinto - paid $650 for it. I did have to put a junk yard engine in it first thing but hey, that was only $200 and a great education. That car was reliable transportation for me for years. I loved that car.

One of my carpoolers always talked about the reports of how these cars tended to catch on fire when hit in the rear. One day a jeep ran into the back at a red light while that guy was sitting in the back seat. He was so in shock he couldn't even move to get out of the car! (No injuries) After whining and moaning the insurance paid me about twice what I had in the car.

I had the smashed car sitting at my house for months when one day I saw one just like it with the front smashed in. A knock on the door led to selling the car to a guy who wanted to combine them into one! That car turned out to be a good investment.

Maybe it wasn't the best car ever made but it sure did get me around. I suspect the lathe discussed here could be used to turn wood.

JKJ

Re: Question......

#41

I got good service from my Pinto..... 

JamieDonaldson

....and don't remember exactly what model year it was.

Re: Question......

#42

Wasn't it the Pinto....

Barry Irby

that had the only successful 10 MPH bumpers? Remember those? Maybe it was 5MPH, but I think it was the only car that passed the "test" without any damage to the body.

Now we have little cars with eleven air bags and if you hit something at 10 MPH and fire them, it totals the car.

Re: Question......

#43

Jim Barbour

Re: It makes me smile

Jim Barbour

Speaking of Pintos, I had a 1970 - one of the first to come out. Before gearing up stateside to make them Ford market tested roughly 6,000 with Tanus engines from Germany and modified bodies made in Canada. I got one of those for $2,400 off the showroom floor - the second sold in the state of KY. Some years later I was in Germany and helping my landlord work on his car. The engine looked a lot like mine. When I got back to the states I looked carefully at mine and realized that everything on the engine in English was on a sticker - pulling them off revealed the German underneath. That's when I searched around and found I had one of the originals.

I took it in for all the various recalls and was told every time that "this does not apply to yours." Ended up selling it for more than I paid, but wish I had it still. It was just like this one - Butterscotch and all:


👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.