Re: A friendly answer
Pam Niedermayer - Austin, TX
>I truly appreciate it that you didn't censor anything, but I would like to respond to your comments that I intended to offend with the "corporate pigs" description. I did not and do not have anything against the normal corporation that operates in an honorable manner. For crying out loud, I owned a corporation and ran it for 23 years.
I did intend to offend those CEO's running predatory corporations that behave badly; although I didn't expect to find any of them here. Maybe you (impersonal) should ask yourself how you feel about Worldcom, Enron, Arthur Anderson, et al.
I have found that there are a few here who seem to enjoy taking offense whenever I open my mouth. Or so I assume, since they seem to prefer complaining in private. I can't and won't do anything to ameliorate or console them. If someone takes offense, at least say so like Jim did, so we have a chance to communicate.
I don't know, guess I was just tired of hearing all the "Oh, I better rush out and buy some now" messages all over the woodworking fora; which to me equates to rewarding Auriou for being a bad actor, if indeed he is. I'm glad that Joel and Rob will make a nice pile of windfall profit.
Pam