Re: Aren't M&Ts and more ...
These days Schwarz must be the only builder using draw-bored joints as intended. I don't think Roger's joints are more than 4-inches, so they work as glued.
Actually, drawbores aren't intended to pull two members together as an alternative to clamping for a tighter glue joint. They serve as a flexible joint for wood contraction-expansion of the connected pieces. Pre-19th century glue joints tended to fail more often than modern glues. The pin is a spring, holding the joint tight.
However, wood still swells and contracts ... moves seasonally. From what I observe in the comments, the mortiser chisels don't extend much more than 3". The "rule-of-thumb" is to break up a glue joint that is greater than ~3". M&Ts greater than 3-inches depth are still subject to splitting from wood movement. And, or, use drawbores or slip joints for those instances.
The drawbores and flexible pins still provide a solid wood joint in members exceeding three to four inches. Stiles in doors almost always exceed 4-inches in width. I don't remember my source of information, probably a library article, however it was about building doors. [Do I risk saying "traditional" doors?] Drawbored joints are a pain to make, and even Garrett Hack makes them a decoration.
So, make the joint 3 inches deep, or stop the glue at three inches, and ignore the flexible pins. But, for me ... if I go to the trouble and cost, I will build doors to the traditional methods. I will die before seeing the things destroyed by demo fools.