Jim asked our advice on the arm supports on this chair. He passed this photo along to me so that I could upload it for him. So here it is. He was having second thoughts about the curved, extended legs supporting the arms. Here's your chance to weigh in. What think, folks?
Ellis
Here's a shot of the arm chair flanked by the side chairs....
Here's another case of needing to do some rough sketching of options before committing to wood. I took the liberty of trying out three possible variations of Jim's design. You tell me if any of them is an improvement on the original...
First, the original:
Next, the solution that Jim was pondering, with the front legs echoing the back legs:
Next, a reversal of the front curve. Think in terms of the motion/thrust implied by the arc of the curve, compared to the original:
Last, and my personal fave, a solution that respects the very rectilinear design of the suite, is economical of line and complexity, and extends the arms to a more generous length:
Thanks Ellis for posting the pictures for me. The comments are similar to some of my thoughts. but 'everyone to their own taste said the woman when she kissed her cow'.
In the direct side view the seat rails look too massive but for chairs without stretchers I want plenty of shoulders on the tenons for strength.
I imagine that cushions will be added but that's out of my department.
I think a blend of #1 (the original) and #2 (mirror of back legs) might look consistent and pleasant. That is, I'd like to see #2 with a less severe break and sort of a more blended curve, maybe like a hyperbola, more curved near the seat and less so at the arms, ending with the angle of the back.
If your trying to reduce racking, a "seat box" with a plywood bottom would afford a stiff subassembly with room for additional bracing (such as hidden glue blocks).