Re: Correct!
Larry Barrett
Not quite a proof, but some thoughts.
The internal angles of an equilateral triangle are 60 degrees. So when the instructions say that the second line forms an angle of 60 degrees with the first line it made me think that perhaps the first line did not need to be 1" from the end,maybe could be anyplace, as long as the second line was at the 60 degree angle.
So now construct the same equilateral triangle (label the angles X, Y, Z) and draw the first line from X through the center to the opposite side. This line bisects angle X and forms an altitude for the triangle. The second line now is drawn from Y through the center and forms an angle 60 degrees to line 1 where they intersect at the center (and this line bisects Y) . Now draw a third line from Z through the center. These three lines divide the triangle into 6 identical internal triangles and it is easy to see that two of these internal triangles now correspond to area B in the original problem, and the remaining 4 internal triangles correspond to area A and the ratio of A to B is 2:1.
Now overlay this with the original lines and you can see that overlapping areas look like they are congruent. Not a real proof, but a visual start.
I suspect that in the original problem, line 1 can start at any point and as long as line 2 forms the 60 degree angle with line 1 at the center, the ratio of areas will be 2:1.