WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Monday's trivia

Posts

Monday's trivia

#1

Monday's trivia

This is something first proclaimed by P.T. Barnum in the 1850�s, but like many things said by P.T. it was bluster. This was started in the U.S. in the early 1900�s but has been for over a hundred years an international competition. It is something done by both men and women, at least one child, and even animals. When it counts it is usually done by one person at a time, but two people at once have tried. Originally an item similar to that used on links was planned (and one actually used) but different ideas emerged. Some ideas were good and others proved to be serious failures. Uniquely, in this case a woman was the first to gain credit for successful completion. Today�s trivia activity requires supporting equipment, early on using wood, mostly oak, but imagination and technology have replaced wood with other materials including metal, foam, rubber, fiber, and fiberglas. Fabrication is the rule, but a over the counter store bought item was successful one time for one person. I can say that weights are involved in many of the items made for the activity. Depending on the person, the activity can take as long as ten hours, but the real effort happens much faster. You might equate it to building a chair, sitting in it once completed, but taking just as long to finish it after building before it is a successful project.

What is the activity I�m talking about?

Re: Monday's trivia

#2

Re: Monday's trivia

Does it use a fuzzy ball?

Re: Monday's trivia

#3

No. Think larger. Also ...

while a ball shape has been involved so have other three dimensional shapes. In all (all in the 20th century) only nineteen have had the gumption to go forward past talking about it. Six participants opted not to go through with it at the last or were otherwise prevented before they could make the effort. Four participants died with their effort and nine completed the task successfully, including a a woman, a seven year old, and a couple of self proclaimed anti drug activists who did it together, but if not drunk, had a few. One person made the attempt in various form five times and was successful twice.

Re: Monday's trivia

#4

Hint

Because of the past danger, depending on the country where the end happens the fines can be $25,000 plus costs or $10,000 plus costs, dead or alive. People who assist the participant are also liable for the fines and jail time is at the very least a threat. The fines seem to be working because new attmpts have not occured this century although other circumstances have made the attempt safer than the old days when there was more to deal with at the critical time.

Re: Monday's trivia

#5

Steven Antonucci

Slowly I turned, inch by inch, step by step

If you've ever been there, you know just how absolutely freakin' nuts you'd have to be to do it...

Steve

Re: Monday's trivia

#6

Re: Slowly I turned, inch by inch, step by step

The starch is enough for me, thanks. While it sounds like a barrel of laughs, I'm not going to fall for the allure of it.

Re: Monday's trivia

#7

Re: Slowly I turned, inch by inch, step by step

would it have anything to do with falling?

Re: Monday's trivia

#8

Re: Monday's answer (long)

Steve, Alex and Dan earned stars. Steve gets extra shine for the Three Stooges reference.

It was difficult not to include the word barrel. The answer is Niagara Falls and going over it in one. Canadian, Horseshoe side only, thank you very much.

The first thought was a large gutta-percha ball with weights on the bottom proposed by P.T. Barnum. But first he wanted to send a dog, and another name for a Black person as a test. It came to naught.

The woman was Annie Taylor in 1901. She did it first in an oak barrel weighing 160 lbs.�22� w at bottom, 34� in the middle and 15 inches at the top. She made it all right, but they lost the barrel and she had another made that she used as a prop selling her story on the street. She died a pauper.

Bobby Leach did it in a cigar shaped steel barrel in 1911. (He also shot the rapids and another time jumped off the Upper Steel Arch Bridge without a parachute�apparently all without injury. A slippery orange peel was his undoing later in life.

Charles Stevens tried next in an oak barrel. Unfortunately he used an anvil to keep the barrel upright and then attached it to his feet. Physics being what they are they found only his arm wrapped in a strap in the barrel later.

George Stathakis used a wooden barrel but it was heavy and only had air for three hours. He got caught in the rocks and sixteen hours later he was pulled out dead, but with him was a 105 year old pet turtle, still alive.

Jean Lussier used a rubber ball stuffed with cotton and inner tubes for �air� similar in design to what was proposed by Barnum. He walked away successful.

Red Hill tried it fully clothed with his pprotection being inner tubes lashed together. All they found of his effort on him later when he surfaced, naked, days later was a wrist watch.

Wm. Fitzgerald, a black man did it in a rubber ball in 1961 called the �plunge-o-sphere�.

John David Munday a non-swimmer with claustrophobia did it twice. One of the times using a seven feet long by 4 feet outfitted with radio equipment and oxygen, cylinder of steel, foam, and aluminum.

The two guys that did it successfully together wore hockey helmets, lying head to head, and took with them a case of beer.

The seven year old boy went over by accident with only a row boat and inexpensive store bought life vest. He made it. His adult companion who tried all he could do to prevent it going over didn�t.

One of the weirdest was the guy who tried it in a kayak. He took off his helmet so the photos would be clearer. He expected to paddle hard then �fly� off the edge and drop free to the bottom. He didn�t count on the adhesion factor of the water, no boundary layer was there to free the boat. He went over nose first and they are still looking for him (since 1990).

Since the 1950�s the falls is about one quarter as powerful, 50,000 cubic feet per second versus 200,000 cubic feet per second, as it once was before the Americans and Canadians siphoned off most of the water upstream to produce electricity. The fall from height is just as great, but the lack of water practically eliminates to possibility of being trapped behind the falls and churning underwater. The fines are substantial too. Anybody out there--with deep pockets�want to try extreme fallsing? The rocky bottomed American Falls still needs a taker.

Anyone interested in viewing the power of the Falls early on before the penstocks for electricity check out painter Frederick Church�s famous huge painting �Niagara� .

Re: Monday's trivia

#9

Re: Monday's answer (long)

I really don't get a star. I only figured it out from some of the hints given by the other players.

Re: Monday's trivia

#10

Steven Antonucci

It's big water...

I can't imgine anyone being crazy enough to try it. I stood on the banks of the river (American side) and the flow was frightening. I can only imagine 4x the power being 4x the crazy.

In a thousand years, Canada will lose a tourist attraction. The best vantage for viewing the falls is from the Canadian side, but the falls cut back into the rock a couple of feet a year. Next millenium, you probably won't be able to see them from the Canadian side...

Steve

Re: Monday's trivia

#11

Re: Monday's answer (long)

And I got it only after Gary's hint.

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.