Re: Brute force (no computers involved)
Steve: Nothing wrong with brute force, as long as it is testing a finite number of cases rather than pure trial and error.
Speaking of "brute force", I can't figure out how to quote with this forum software, so I am going to just copy your entire post and insert comments set off with asterisks.
Your post:
Assuming that you know enough geometry to be dangerous, we can start by calculating all of the solvable angles via the sum of angles=180.
Two intersecting lines in the middle form equal angles of 50 and 130 degrees allow me to end up with only four mystery angles.
ADE
AED
DEB
EDC
*********************
And knowing any one of these makes the others trivial
*********************
I know that:
EDC+DEB=130
AED+DEB=140
ADE+EDC=150
AED+ADE=160
Some quick mathematical substitution tells me:
AED=EDC+10
and
ADE=DEB+20
********************
I'm with you so far
********************
At this point, I knew that I was looking for four numbers that were either ending in 5 or 0,
***********************
How do you know that? It will probably be obvious once you state it, but I don't see it.
***********************
so I guessed 0 and randomly started with 50. I added to it to get 60, which gave AED and EDC. I plugged them into the formula and found the other two were 80 and 100. I then back checked the answers against all of the formulas and it worked...
************************
But I think it worked because you were testing it with the same formulas you used to determine the other angles once one was set. I think you could "prove" any angle worked with this method!
I assume you are saying AED = 60, EDC = 50, ADE = 100, and DEB = 80, Wouldn't AED = 53, EDC = 43, ADE =107, and DEB = 87 satisfy these conditions just as well? I think there is a condition missing.
Alex