Monday , in the clouds
I shall be on travel until Monday evening. Answers then. Here is the second group questions concerning lighter than air ship trivia.
The Hindenburg had a volume of 7,062,000 cubic FEET. When filled with hydrogen anyone care to hazard a guess how much was its gross lift? By comparison, today a 747 can lift 400 tons but uses about 64,000 gallons of fuel to do it. Note: All things being at standard temperature and pressure (STP) my numbers arrive at 1 cubic METER of hydrogen gets 1.2 pounds of lifting force.
Hydrogen is odorless. There was a low tech way to know if there was a leak (and no fair saying seeing �fire�). Hydrogen flames are invisible. Germany used one way. NASA (in the 1960�s no less) came up with a way to test No joke. What was their answer to avoid being fried by hydrogen flames? (If you don�t know you won�t believe this one).
The Hindenburg was originally designed to use helium. Why didn�t the Hindenburg use helium? Helium was four times as expensive as hydrogen but cost wasn�t the reason. As it was, it was an expensive proposition as hydrogen fill up costs were expensive. At an average $9 per 1000 cu ft, what did it cost to do the initial fill up in 1937?
Where did the name �blimp� come from? (Hint: It was rumored to be from Britain.)
What was the top speed of a Zeppelin type ship? For about the same price as a cruise ship how much time was saved on a trip Europe to United States? England or France to New York (ship) vs. Frankfort to Lakehurst, New Jersey (airship).