WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Monday's not so Grand Challenge

Posts

Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#1

Monday's not so Grand Challenge

If done well this is probably my second preference in wood furniture. The type I'm searching for was developed in the 17th and 18th centuries but visual traces can be found earlier and later. It is international as it has been developed and amended all over the planet. Its feature is its design. For U.S. Easterners mostly these days’ originals are very much in vogue. The furniture is practical but good design is good design and many appreciate good examples for its look alone. Bauhaus attempted his vision of it and did "improve" it for some people. Not better exactly but different. The problem for today's woodworker is that the proper wood aside, select components and accessories are difficult if not impossible to find. To do it poorly looks ridiculous and to do them well, well, takes money and skill. Accuracy in production is important. This is not the typical weekend bash to make this stuff as it is time consuming and deceptively complex. There is an elegance that is unmistakable but it was not meant for looking. What furniture am I writing about?

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#2

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

The art of the furniture or the craft?

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#3

I'm looking for a style or type of furniture

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#4

Hint: The purpose of the style...

was to project an image. Who you were, status, and station were definitely involved.

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#5

Re: Hint two

The style is not American although a religious group with havens in PA and MA and OH used its principles. Much of look appears to be visually linked to much older furniture of the East. The style extended beyond furniture to accessories.

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#6

Hmmm

I was thinking of art deco or arts and crafts.

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#7

Hint: One hour final shot...

while I compose my answer.

This might have been the original knock down furniture. No, not Ikea.

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#8

Re: Hint: One hour final shot...

Is there a religious connection?

Tommy

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#9

Re: Hint: One hour final shot...

Campaign furniture?

Re: Monday's not so Grand Challenge

#10

Answer, long. Mad dogs and...

Englishmen go out in the noonday sun. Bill came through at the last.

The next time you go to an outdoor wedding thank the British for your folding chair. The type of furniture I was thinking of was British Campaign furniture, made from 1740-1914. Fine furniture made to bring England into the Empire. India, Africa, America and all points British, both land and sea had fold up and “knock down furniture” for the officer corps--actually pretty ritzy stuff. Top quality British makers like Hill & Millard, E. Ross, Day and Son, Thomas Butler, Morgan and Sanders, William Pocock and others made fine bookcases, beds, chairs, fold out couches, tables, clothes presses, dispatch desks, instrument boxes, medicine, personal, and liquor cabinets, that made life in the bush -–I say old chap--appear like home. Campaign furniture was usually made of mahogany (teak and walnut too) with fine INLAID brass hardware on the stress points, bang around points, and hinges. (Some, mostly travel cases had overlapping and hob nailed metal coverings). Most campaign interior furniture had inset locks with flush, “sunken” or droop handles for easy moving. Pieces were stamped with numbers and letters (H3 attached to H3) for easy reassembly, many had secret compartments, and were by design, compact. Various and ingenious clips and pin and hole hardware was made to hold stuff aligned when stacked or apart to prevent collapse when in use, but capable of being removed so the furniture could be disassembled, “folded” and efficiently packed in its own transportation case. Much of the furniture was curvilinear and so well made you would never suspect it was made as break down.

The tie to America was, of course, Shaker utilitarian style and shape. The Chinese nesting chest and Japanese Tansu furniture has visual similarity, but normally with iron hardware applied on top, not inlaid. As to Bauhaus, based on the famous Roorkhee campaign furniture chair, Marcel Breuer designed the internationally known tubular steel and leather Wassily chair. In America, Baker and Henredon made similar looking furniture in the 1960s but while it looked good it was absent important components and did not fold or break down. "Campaign" caught on and soon other companies made copies too but applied thin, cheap hardware, dumped the locks, and completely ignored furniture building technique.

Today few of even the best catalogs and hardware companies carry decent and appropriate hardware. Heavy gauge brass corners, “L” braces, locks and some casters are available but the large diameter brass screw in mates, clips, swivels, pins, and cover plates and even accurate handles are really difficult to find. Because there are so many inlays with angles and points to do this well requires lots of accurate chisel and gouge work for fitting.

Best book source I’ve found for info is British Campaign Furniture by Nicolas Brawer. The price can be steep ($45.00 list), but search around if you have interest. If you aren’t bored to tears by now some neat examples can be found at: http://www.antiques-in-england.com/Default.asp?offset=12. Lots of campaign stuff from cabinets to boot jacks to clothes hooks. Values are listed in pounds sterling.

If any one has a British (foreign)source for legit hardware let me know. I’ve exhausted some twenty plus U.S. hardware companies plus the companies mentioned above (if still around).

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.