grind angles
Keith Tompkins
In a previous post about cutting coves, I send an image of a fluteless mini-gouge I am working on. In this image, there are some things I have been experimenting with. First, image A represents a side view of a scraper that has a top angle ground to create a negative rake scraper. This, for whatever reason, causes the tool to have less tendency to self-feed or catch. My reasoning is, if this is so, can the same concept be applied to other types of turning tools. The second image B shows a side view of a flute-less gouge or skewji gouge. Notice the tip of the top grind has a "positive" angle; it hooks upward. As ground, this tool will be grabby, and will cause unexpected catches, even while riding the bevel. In C, the grind is at a "negative" angle, facing downward. I found that a tool ground this way will have little or no tendency to catch, even if handled carelessly. I have ground tools from a 3/8" bowl gouge to a 1/16" detailer with this grind, and they all work as I had hoped. There is no flute to weaken the shaft (and cause vibration, or catch an edge) so the tool can be extended further over the tool rest, and the cutting point is well below center, which I think contributes to fewer catches. Thoughts or comments?

Hi Dennis, the tool I'm referring to is the center image. The tool below it is my Thompson detail gouge as a reference. With my fluteless gouge (skewji-gouge variation) the cutting edge faces downward, and the bevel is very small.


