I agree
Terry Daniel
>I see both sides of this but I must agree that Arizona Silhouette is the loser. If losses were only 3 in 10,000 it is such a small percentage of sales that it would be better to absorb the loss than to have an unhappy customer. If the order was of greater value then insurance should not have been optional but for under a hundred bucks the risk/benefit ration is tipped toward omitting it for AS; but for the customer who is looking at 1/1 instead of 3/10,000 the risk is much greater. I have found that in recent years the hassle of getting a claim settled is greater than just replacing an item and absorbing it. UPS has become the worst for damaging goods and filing a claim with them for a significant amount can take months and may only end when you tell them that it is about to be turned over to the legal process. I have one supplier that will not ship anything by UPS anymore. The world is changing folks.
TD















