Re: Surgical Mask for dust protection?
Bill Howatt
>I would have said wow! 91% 0.1 micron efficiency. However I read on a NIOSH website an article that said particles finer than 0.3 micron are easier to capture than the 0.3 even though it isn't what you would expect. This applies to Part 84 filter respirators (???). Below is the relevant passage.
1. How effective are the Part 84 filter respirators against particles smaller than 0.3 micrometer in diameter?
The 0.3-micrometer diameter used in the certification testing is approximately the most penetrating particle size for particulate filters. Although it seems contrary to expectation, smaller particles do not penetrate as readily as 0.3-micrometer particles. Therefore, these respirators will filter all other particle sizes at least as well as the certified efficiency level.
Anybody shed any more light on this?
Bill