Re: Attenborough and Irwin
Pam Niedermayer - Austin, TX
>I never watched Irwin, don't even know if he was available outside cable; but the little I've seen shows someone a bit hot for my TV tastes, way too frantic. I prefer to generate my own enthusiasm. Probably a real nice guy and all that, probably a conservationist; but the stunts I've seen (again, just the stuff shown on the news, like baby dangling) did nothing for conservation and certainly were unappealing to me. I don't like to see people, especially children, put in harm's way. This is most likely genetic, my Dad couldn't even watch Lassie. :)
Attenborough, otoh, informs and often gets just as close to the animals as Irwin; although some of it appears to be front projection. He never would say what you suggest. Instead he'd be cavorting with blue whales, investigating ant and termite mounds (see the one where he caused the ants to spray formulin by waving a wand?), interacting with birds of all sorts, showing new research into how lions and other cats actually hunt, etc.
It's all a show vs content debate. I prefer content. I gather that most people prefer show.
Pam