Using Antique Tools--Adam, Joel, all
Kevin Adams
>I have to admit that this post was originally intended as a bit of a "gloat" (meant tongue-in-cheek as I'm not much of a gloater), but then reading the latest issue of Woodwork magazine has caused me to pause for a minute to reconsider some things. I don't know if others are interested in commenting or not, but here goes.
I'm mostly (almost exclusively) a hand tool user and mostly make Windsor chairs and other reproduction furniture. I also mostly used modern versions of the appropriate tools (without getting into brands here). As the years have gone by and I've gotten more experience with hand tools, I've realized how much one can do with quite little. I've also come to appreciate old wooden planes and have accumulated some nice wooden smoothers, jacks, a fore plane, dados, and a few molding planes. I also have a great 22" trying plane, but have been searching for some time for a big, traditional wooden jointer like Adam and others advocate. As fate would have it, I recently purchased an absolutely beautiful 34" jointer plane. (I may try to send some photos later.) The plane is from a rather well known dealer. He described it as a yellow birch plane from southern CT, "circa 1800". If this means anything to folks out there, the name on the on the toe is (I believe) "SMWood". The iron is almost 2.75" wide and is warranted cast steel with (I believe) the name "William Ash" on it.
The plane is in great shape with wonderful color and appears to have been used very little. The iron has a noticeable camber to it, but is quite dull (btw, should it be straight or cambered?). My plan is to use it for its intended purpose, but then I was reading Kerry Pierce's article in Woodwork about restoring (and using) antique planes. Frankly, I'm not questioning whether this plane is as old as it was described as being (and I have no reason to doubt it), nor would I care if it was from a more recent era. I only care if it does what it's supposed to do. But here's the question: Would you much more knowledgeable folks use this plane, given that it is apparently over 200 years old? I have always enjoyed studying history, particularly from the revolutionary and post revolutionary war era. I also have a real reverence for old things and old tools, but I express that reverence by using things (NB: not abusing) for their intended purpose. In fact, I would rather use this plane than a modern version from one of the top notch planemakers out there.
Maybe I've rambled on too long and maybe people don't care to discuss this, but I thought I'd throw it out there for the group and see what anyone thinks. Again, my original idea was to post a picture of this bad boy and see if Adam thought this was a "real" jointer! Joel, you were quoted in the article so perhaps you can offer some perspective as a collector and user of tools. Adam, I also know that you use 18th century tools. The article mentioned a plane currently owned by Lee Richmond (of "The Best Things") that was made by a gentleman who fought at Bunker Hill. I guess I would say that plane is to be preserved for a collector, not used. I have no reason to believe that my plane is historically significant (mostly because the dealer would have known and the price would have been higher), but where would you draw the line?
Thanks for anything that people want to offer on this subject.
Kevin


