Re: So any idea of how much it costs
Frank D. in Montreal
>Hi Cameron, I'm not Fred but if you read one of his posts above (in response to Mr. Lee) you'd find this:
"Mr. Lee,
Interesting comments, thank you.
I made a business visit today to one of the major USA bearing manufacturers, the dept. head of their testing lab is an old classmate. We were discussing bearing life in the rolling mills my company designs. He commented that with one of the commonly used bearings in my machines that his competition has always produced bearings with longer life. He purchased some of their bearings and checked the metallurgy and heat treatment,,,,exactly the same material and hardness, etc.
The only explanation their metallurgists could present was the actual process of making the steel used by the competition was different than their source of steel.
I have also observed this difference in wear with D2 steel rolls for our mills. Some steel makers have superior steel for life and toughness. The chemistry is textbook identical however, the end product is much improved.
Obviously you have tested your source of A2 steel with and without -300F cryo. Have you tested other producers of A2?
We also have had problems with commodity (low price wins the bid) tool steels having poor quality compared to those steels with mill certifications and identified sources."
I think it's quite clear where Fred is coming from. And he was forthright enough to mention that his experience did not extend to woodworking tools. That doesn't, as you seem to imply although I'm not sure, invalidate his input on the cryogenic process, and I don't think he dismissed anything said by Mr. Lee. In fact I appreciate the fact that that someone who has some first-hand knowledge about the cryo process takes the time to talk about it to us here on the forum. Do we really have to pick at him about his credentials?
Frank