WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

Posts

Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#1

Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

WoodburnBob

> MaintextSpiersHandle In this post I'll do my best to show you how I went about rehabilitating a severely abused and nearly unusable hand tool. To me it's about Zen and truth. To those who know me it's about folly and anomie. It's vastly overdone and a little embarrassing.

I have no credentials for what I'll describe; I'm entirely self-taught. When I started doing this sort of thing a couple years ago I looked everywhere for detailed advice... with little luck. I'd still like to know what the experts have to say about all the little details, but I'm resigned to thinking they intend to die with their real secrets intact. Perhaps that's simply the difference between experts and dilettantes.

Anyway, for the pragmatic reader, I'll also be showing you a method by which you can: Take a $200 object. Spend $100 to $1000 in tools and supplies. Invest 20 hours or so of your spare time. And, potentially increase the value of that object by $50 to $100 dollars.


So, on with the show. The object in question is an ordinary curve-sided and handled Spiers infill in need of what I believe the British call "attention". It came with the top deck detached and sported a short nub of a handle remnant. The handle was broken an inch or two up from the bottom -- a common site of fracture. The larger part of the handle had been lost to antiquity.

I chiseled and pried out the handle tenon and nub and then thought to start taking pictures for posterity.

What you see here is the general configuration of most infills...at least those that I've opened. To be clear: the mortise or slot you see in the body of the lower rear infill was cut by a Scot , perhaps Spiers himself, not me. That is to say, the back infill is a three piece assembly fitted together, glued and then pinned with 1/4 inch mild steel rods in two places. The rear pin you see here. The other pin lies about mid-body.

Lots of choices are available in how to go about attaching a new handle. One fellow on the WWW recommends doing it with the upper bed/deck and pin undisturbed. In that case the tenon of the new handle has to branch around the pin. I think it makes for a pretty dubious fit, but I've tried this once or twice for infills with top decks firmly in place. I don't like the process and doubt I'll do it again.

So for this plane, I removed the pin using a thin 1" diameter cut off blade in a Dremel like grinder and pried both ends out from the middle. Breaking the peened rod ends out of the side walls takes a bit more effort than you might imagine. Other times I've drilled and punched them out before tackling the handle remnant and upper deck. As I say, there are lots of ways for the adventuresome fellow to address the various details.

The new handle blank itself comes from a 5/4 piece of East Indian Rosewood. The board is about 6" by 4 feet. I scored this a couple years ago and don't take pieces from it often. It is reserved for what you're seeing here. It was flat sawn and the grain runs anterior-posterior like all conventional handles. Given how the blank looks here, the final appearance of this piece may surprise you later.

I've done this initial cutting-out before using coping saws and powered jig saws. I don't want to do it that way anymore. This summer I splurged and went out and bought a $100 band saw.



To atone for the band saw sin, I decided to knock the edges off with a gouge and lignum mallet I bought when I was 17...40 years ago! It is unchanged. I wish I could say the same.

This is hard wood and if the gouge isn't up to it, this is a poor technique. I don't carve much and enjoy playing around so that's what I use here.

I imagine many would look at the blank and think of a router and round-over bit. I don't like the noise, bother or process. It won't by itself give you what you want anyway.

The trick, if there is one, to doing this is to have sawn the blank not to small and not too big, and then to whack out stuff with the gouge, but not too much and not too little. Clear enough?


My next step was the #49 Nicholson wood rasp...connected to the blond handle in the background. Lying just beyond it is an finer toothed unhandled #50.

This is very pleasant work and goes quite fast. At least that's so if the rasps are being used to smooth a nicely chiseled shape rather than remove large bulk.

What you see here is the product of the #49 and the half round wood file in the foreground.


Here's more of the same a little further along. Two of the Norris brothers showed up there in the background to keep an eye on what was happening.


Of course, throughout this wood sculpting process you'd be fondling the handle, getting the curves right, adjusting the feel.

At this point I was happy with everything about the fit in my hand. Sadly, once assembled the top of the handle sat about 3/8" too high for the blade to seat against the bed. About half the wood under my index finger had to be removed. You may or may not notice that in the later pictures.


So here I've followed up with a little coarse sandpaper and then the maroon pad.

I had used this other handle to trace out the pattern for this one. I would have used it in the first place for this plane, but some fool got into the basement sometime in the last year and took the thickness from 5/4 to about 1". The mortise width on this plane is close to 1.1". Yes, it could have been shimmed. I just didn't want to stoop to a shim fix. Whim.

So, at this point in the story I go off camera and I take out the pin, trim and fit the tenon and mess around a lot getting the deck to seat firmly and tightly. This entails getting the rust and grunge off the to-be-covered-up steel edges. Fitting the mouth/lips of the mortise around the inner curve of the lower part of the handle is not an easy matter. There's a shot latter of how this turned out. For now let's just glue it up.

Pretty familiar sight, eh? Yes, it's dried and spongy Gorilla Glue oozings after an over-night clamp-up. I overdid glue volume in the mortise cavity and it's nice to see the excess got out along the sides of the handle and through the hole that the rear pin had occupied.

I need to point out that the orange pictures like this one are taken without the camera flash.


By using the camera flash, as I have here, the colors are rendered much cooler, as in more blue. It's true that if I were a less imperfect person, I would pick one...flash or no flash... and remain consistent. Hobgoblins. Little minds. You know the line.

This picture reminds me to mention that it's relatively important to line the planes of the upper bed with the lower bed. And then try to secure this alignment with a couple of clamps.

This is also a good picture to get a better sense of the look and patina of old brass: the lever and screw. I never, never disturb the brass. It sickens me to see polished lever caps on these old men (he says, oblivious to the destruction and carnage he perpetrates elsewhere). At this point the original wood finish is still intact more or less, and I call your attention to the slight orange tint compared with the nearly purplish brown of my replacement wood. Aesthetically, I don't care much for wood finish and tend to leave tool woods to the patina of sweat, grime and skin oils. Odd sensibilities wouldn't you say?


Here's an even better view of the handle's coloring. I hope you see kind of a mallard green and purple along with the reddish brown. In fact the green and purple are more striking in real life. It's a very beautiful but subtle wood.

The original wood on these old Spiers is quite dark and extremely aromatic when you cut it. Intoxicating actually.


Someone must want to see the other side.

Let me call your attention to the steel side plates. This one shows rather conspicuous pitting. In fact, I've done a fair amount of rust removal and filing on this side up to this point...just not as much as the other side.

Intermixed throughout this whole process I'd have my way with the steel and pits and rust whenever my hormones and tensions seemed to need a little release. That is to say, my approach is non-linear, disorganized, whimsically iterative...in a word organic.


The dried glue came off very easily via the peel, scrape and cut method. Then a little hand sanding and delicate needle filing in the crevices and here we are. Really just a pleasant half hour job that I strung out for longer.

Recall the purple and green tints. They're gone only because a bulb above the bench was my only light source here.

By the way, that's foamy glue in the pin hole, which still needs to be drilled through, filled, peened and filed.

But by this time I was itching to do a little work on the sole. You can see why.

I cleaned off a 9 X 12 inch granite surface plate that I bought new from one of the machinist supply outlets...probably Enco. $20 for it and $20 for shipping....something on that order.

The bluing is traditional Dykem HiSpot . It's about the consistency of grease. I roll it out with a three-inch rubber roller brayer (printmaking section in an art store). Set the plane on the plate and giggle...er...no, sorry... jiggle it a little: Blue transfers to the high spots. The lighter blue is generally a true high spot. The darker blue around it is smear that's been pushed off a high spot. If you were scraping, you'd try just to slice off the light spots. I can tell you that from eyeball estimates of this sole with a straightedge and light, that the distance between high and low is probably on the order of 0.002". Not huge by any means. I guess the guys who don't worry much about flat soles wouldn't go further. But I've used this plane and think it could do a lot better with some sole work. I'm not working on this sole because of appearance.


After about 30 minutes of heavy filing and spotting, this is where I end up. Primarily my goal up to this point is simply to get to a rough stage where 1) most of the width just in front of the mouth, 2) a far forward toe mark and 3) a far backward part of the heel are in the same plane...that is, that they spot blue. Nothing beautiful, symmetrical or particularly uniform.


I took about a dozen photos of the stages that the blued sole went through but decided not to put them up. The changes are subtle and belie the large amount of metal removed. I'll confess that I then cleaned off my granite surface plate and put down a 9 X 12 sheet of 120 grit SiC dry-wall screen. I was very gentle in taking 10 or 20 passes. As always, when I rechecked the result of that kind of extra effort, both by straightedge and by spotting, I had severely degraded the flatness and was well on my way to replacing the formerly flat surface with a dome. Evidently I cannot learn from experience. Ashamed, I backtracked and spent another hour or two correcting the damage I'd produced in less than two minutes with the abrasive sheet.


Eventually I was tired of metal work and wanted some woodwork. I went over the flattened sole with a flat carborundum stone for a minute or two in order to smooth up some of the file lines and put the still less than flat plane to wood.

This is mahogany with mostly straight grain. While the shavings are a bit thick at this point, I was gratified to see evidence of flatness in the width and length of the shavings.


I took a break and came back to put in the pin. The Spiers man had drilled this hole about 5 or 10 degrees off perpendicular to the long axis of the plane. I wanted a line from one hole to the other and the easiest way to do it for me was to use the lathe. The drill goes in one hole and a center mounted in the tail stock goes in the other hole. The plane isn't clamped. I run the lathe slowly, hold the plane in my left hand and turn the tail stock screw with my right. Done in less time than it takes to describe it.


The original pin had a 0.235 diameter. My replacement piece of 1/4 rod was 0.265. The hole I drilled on the lathe was nominally 0.25. I stuck the rod in the lathe, turned off 0.030 and put a tiny dip in each end of the rod and cut it to length. Yawn. Better think about getting yourself a metal lathe. No?

You can just make out the new pin setting In the hole. In the vice is an old throw-away lathe center. I'm just experimenting with the divots and the center to hold the plane still while I'm peening. Put the lower pin divot on the center and start peening the upper one. I've done this (replacing pins) enough times to have learned that leaving the pin too long is poor form. Too short is even worse. There's an optimal length. I never manage to find it. Today I was sweating it that I could fill the two counter sinks.


Here's the proof it turned out okay. It is extremely pleasant to see the pin disappear as you file it down. It always looks like it won't somehow. Different steel or whatever. Yet it always disappears in the end.


I've nearly run out of tasks. But we do need to get back to the sole. I haven't tried out this cast iron lapping plate for a year or two. It weighs 30 or 40 pounds. There are probably lots of them lying around dormant in old machine shops. Beat the bushes. Resurrect one yourself. Unused, they are very sad and lonely.

In the jar I have some medium grit SiC I bought in a local rock hound shop. Nothing special about it. I sprinkled it out and squirt out a little 3-in-1 oil. Just experimenting. I've used kerosene, mineral oil, paraffin lamp oil, paint thinner. Functionally it doesn't seem to matter too much. One will seem too thin. The other will seem too viscous. After a few minutes of this kind of lapping, I clean off all the grit and oil and re-spot the sole on the granite plate. I decided this was good enough.


The loose grit left a fairly coarse surface so I polished it down a little by sequentially wrapping wet-dry paper of 400, 800 and 1500 grit around a 1-2-3 block. These are pretty cheap in import quality and have advertised flatness tolerances around 0.0005. This shined things up fine. I just didn't clean off the oil slurry for this photo.


So now to unltimate �smoother� function.

I guess you'll have to take my word for it that these are fine and consistent smoother shavings. They require little effort. At this point, for me, it's mostly tactile and kinesthetic....the feel...the quality and consistency of the vibration in the context of movement . For me, these sensations correlate with what I'll later see and feel of the wood surface.


So now that the rehab project more or less turned out okay, I've gone back and done a bit more cosmetic work both on the steel and the handle. There is a thin line in this silk purse sow's ear business. I don't want to wind up with a Gloria Swanson.

The handle still hasn't received any kind of applied finish. It darkened dramatically by hand sanding. Yes, same paper: 400, 800 and 1500 using a little 3-in-1 oil as lubricant.


Not bad, eh?




Oh, by now someone is probably dying to point out the long spur and it's vulnerability. I agree completely. In part this is the result of having to trim height to get the handle under the blade. Like an optical illusion. Still, the spur is too ostentatious, and certainly will get whacked if dropped. But for now I'm planning to leave it to the gods or someone else.


Hopefully, a few of you enjoyed this pictorial of reconditioning, refurbishment, rehabilitation, rejuvenation, renewal, repair, restoration, renovation. I don't know what to call it.




Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#2

I enjoyed it thoroughly! Thanks.

Roger Nixon

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#3

OT - Alright, alright - now wait just a minute...

Scott in Douglassville, PA

>What's the deal with y'all using tables to post pictures all of a sudden? Noticed one post yesterday, and it struck me as different. Now here's yours. What gives? When did everyone decide to get HTML table saavy?!

Man, I hate when I miss clear formatting opportunities...

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#4

got to save this to read later...

Vic P

>;>)

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#5

What a great tale

Scott Burr in Ben Lomond CA

>Thanks so much for posting this. It's a very enjoyable and funny story. I think the Norris twins would agree and they looked some what jelous too. Thanks so much. Scott

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#6

Really good, thanks Bob

David Miller from Iowa

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#7

Thin Handle Spurs Can Survive

Steve Elliott

>Thanks for an interesting and informative post.

As for the long handle spur and its chance of surviving without damage, here's a picture of a Spiers smoother with a thin spur that has survived for about a century. As the picture shows, the front infill didn't fare as well.




The rear infill on this plane came unglued, so I had a chance to see the construction inside. It was just like yours, except there was a filler piece of softwood that filled a gap above the tenon on the handle. The handle joint looked as if it had been done quickly, but it's still solid after all these years, and the sole of the plane was so worn that it's clear the plane has done lots of hard work.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#8

Neat! and cool : )

Tim of San Leandro

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#9

Jim in Burlington Ont.

Great Post thanks

Jim in Burlington Ontario

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#10

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

Charles

>I can tell from your post that you were not given the "gift" of attention deficit disorder. I would have wondered off somewhere after taking the plane apart and never finished the project. Perhaps this is what the box of plane parts in the shop are. I can't remember anymore. It is nice to know someone can finish long projects.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#11

Great article

Dan Donaldson

>I particularly like the way you used the lathe to line up two holes to drill through. That is a great idea that I have never seen. I will definately have to remember that one.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#12

Re: Thin Handle Spurs Can Survive

WoodburnBob

>Handsome plane! That may the best looking handle I've seen. It speaks of those who've had it in their care: no blundering bunglers in that family. I've given a few ragged buns a crew cut, too.

The new iron caught my eye. Whaddya pay? From where? I take it this means you're using the plane?

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#13

Thanks, fellas, for the kind words

WoodburnBob

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#14

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

Frank Mutchler

>Great article, Bob. Please enlighten me on the use of your lathe to align the cross pin holes.

If the tailstock center is placed in one hole and an oversize drill chucked in the headstock is used to drill through the other hole, won't the drill simply enlarge the hole it is in following its existing centerline? I realize that the centerline of the tailstock/headstock is true but I don't understand how a flexible twist drill will correct the misaligned hole through the plane. Obviously it did...because you did it but I can't wrap my brain around the 'why' ;>(

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#15

My fault, Frank

WoodburnBob

>You are exactly right. I needlessly confused things by the gratuitous dig at the Spiers boys not drilling a perfectly aligned hole: perpendicular to the long axis of the plane.

The entry point through one side, the path of the hole through wood and the exit point on the other side form a more or less straight line. You, I think, took me to mean the line between entry and exit was not the same as the line of the path through the infill wood.

You are precisely correct that the twist drill followed the origin path until it hit and crossed the replacement handle's tenon. I hoped it would stay pretty well aligned through the tenon and pick up the old path on the other side and then run on straight to the exit point on the other side.

No matter how well I line up a portable drill (or something like an infill plane on a drill press table), the exit isn't where I planned.

For me, aim is more the problem than twist drill wandering. My usual Normish solution is to just drill halfway from both sides for something like this. In my vainglory I guess I was trying to show off the lathe and its operator.

But you bring up a great point: if a guy wanted to really do this right, he'd use a gundrill bit and a temporary soft center. I still haven't inspected the bit and hard center I used. I guess I'm not yet prepared to see the evidence of stupidity in the chipped bit edge and center point. I did feel them touch. Only lightly, I tell myself.

The slightly snide remark on the Spiers boys was unconscious. A flaw in my character. No matter how hard I try to purge these vestiges of my irreverrent and cynical youth from my thoughts and speech, each day another pimple greets me in the mirror.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#16

Re:Amen! Thanks.

Jim Toews - Walla Walla, WA

>

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#17

Thanks, Bob...

Frank Mutchler

>...I too had visions of a chipped drill bit and damaged t/s center when the two met. Appreciate your comments as they have allowed me to untwist my brain and see that all is well with the world once again ;>)

Again, thanks very much for a wonderfully enlightening post and I hope there will be more down the road!

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#18

Re: Thanks, Bob...

Todd O. Cronkhite Native of Maine

>I enjoyed it as well Bob. I do wish however that more of the pictures came out, but other than that it was a terrific piece of work documenting this restoration. I especially enjoyed the fact that you was honest enough to mention your goofs as well because by doing so it makes it a bit less intimidating to a newbie who might want to try this type of in-depth restoration for him/herself. A round of Cheers for Bob.

Have you decided if you're going to be a "flasher" or not yet? ;~)

Todd O.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#19

New Blades

Steve Elliott

>The piece of metal that looks like a blade is precision-ground A2 that I planned to use to make a blade. Since I took the picture a couple of years ago, I've made blades using CPM 3V instead, which I think I prefer. (I'm still testing both A2 and 3V.)

I've bought new infill blades from Karl Holtey and Hock.

The Holtey S53 currently sells for �149, which is enough to buy a plane with. It was so hard to grind that I more or less gave up on using it very often, plus it seemed to get small nicks in the edge even with bevel angles above 35�.

The Holtey A2 sells for �127, and is a good blade.

Just yesterday I got a batch of CPM 3V blades back from heat treatment. Each of the 5 infill blades is fitted to a particular plane in both width and thickness. They still need to be lapped, ground and honed, and they're thick enough to allow some final work on the plane bed and mouth. The cost of the 3V stock for each blade was about $30, and the heat treatment worked out to $5 each because I batched them with blades from another woodworker. The real price of a craftsman-made blade is the time it takes, which is at least 10 hours apiece for me. But this is my hobby, so the time spent doing it is the pay-off.

Here's a scan of one of the new 3V blades, made to fit a Norris 5:




My first 3V blade has been in use in an old Norris for a while now, and it performs well. Grinding is slow but entirely possible on my Tormek, and honing is possible with both waterstones and diamond lapping paste. I use the waterstones for the blade back to prevent dubbing, and 1 micron diamond for the bevel. I'm going straight from the Tormek to 1 micron because it's pretty quick to get a small secondary bevel done, and I don't want to get larger diamond grit embedded in my cast iron lap.

Thanks again for your post. The repair part was useful, and your comments were entertaining.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#20

Wow, Steve

WoodburnBob

>Very professional looking iron. You said 10 hours a blade? Is that right? You're a saint or something. Makes me think you are using a hand powered hack saw, drill press, files and abrasives. High grade dedication. But it sure looks like it's more than worth the effort. I take your remarks to mean all your infills have custom fit irons with however small or large you want the mouth openings. My hat's off to you. The monogram is really nice; makes me want to ask how it's done.

You didn't mention what you thought of the Hock paralell irons. I'd be curious to know. They are about the only ones I've seen commercially, though I suspect some of the contemporary infill and kit makers offer something. Still as you point out: limited/standardized thicknesses.

Wouldn't it be great to have Holtey as an uncle or brother-in-law...or to suddenly find a Holtey Outlet Store in one of those distant rural malls alongside a freeway in Eastern Whereever.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#21

Mostly hand power

Steve Elliott

>The blades were made using a hacksaw and files, plus a power drill press. A lot of the time goes into lapping the steel stock to get past all the tiny surface pits (at least on what will be the back of the blade). I sometimes use my Tormek to remove stock, but that's slow too, and I have to keep checking to see where the high spots are. When I have to take the thickness down by .015" or so to make it fit, things get really tedious.

The logo was done by a laser engraving shop. My plan is to use the border with its twenty rays to record the final thickness of the finished blade. By marking two of the rays, I can indicate the second and third decimal places of the thickness.

I haven't had a chance to test the Hock iron yet, although it's lapped and sharpened.

Having Karl Holtey as a brother-in-law would be great, but I count myself lucky to have a brother who is both a journeyman machinist and a mechanical engineer. He's been a great resource for my attempts at metalworking.

You put your finger on the central issue when you said that commercially available infill blades come only in limited thicknesses. The motivation for my blade-making has been to end up with each of my planes custom fitted with a blade that takes and holds an excellent edge. I'm not there yet, but this batch of blades is a big step forward.

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#22

Re: Mostly hand power *LINK*

joel

>"commercially available infill blades come only in limited thicknesses."

this is actually not true. Call Ray Iles of the Old Tool Store in England - tell him how thick you want your blade and he grinds them up custom (and he's not too expensive). He feels pretty strongly that infill blades must be custom fitted bacause unlike STanley planes they do not have an adjustable mouth and you normally want a pretty tight fit.

His blades are D2 which may not suit everyone - and this discussion on making higher tech blades is very interesting and I plan to give it a whack myself - but for a good well preforming replacement I think he's a good choice.

Note: (in the interests of full disclosure I do stock almost every tool he makes EXCEPT his blades which I use.)


The Old Tool Store

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#23

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

paul womack

>I'll also be showing you a method by which you can: Take a $200 object. Spend $100 to $1000 in tools and supplies. Invest 20 hours or so of your spare time. And, potentially increase the value of that object by $50 to $100 dollars.

Hah! I worked out that trick for myself, years ago :-)

I mean, I can add nearly 2 GBP to the value of a 2 GBP chisel in less than 2 hours, and I only use equipment worth 100 GBP to do it :-)

BugBear (who fortunately doesn't restore chisels for a living)

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#24

Re:carving - shaping

paul womack

>I find when working on totes (Bailey - nothing so upmarket as Spiers) this gadget is very helpful and versatile.

Work holding trick

BugBear

Re: Infill as Metaphor, or another folly depicted

#25

Re: Hijack - flattening

paul womack

>I keep saying this, but no-one believes me.



I took about a dozen photos of the stages that the blued sole went through but decided not to put them up. The changes are subtle and belie the large amount of metal removed. I'll confess that I then cleaned off my granite surface plate and put down a 9 X 12 sheet of 120 grit SiC dry-wall screen. I was very gentle in taking 10 or 20 passes. As always, when I rechecked the result of that kind of extra effort, both by straightedge and by spotting, I had severely degraded the flatness and was well on my way to replacing the formerly flat surface with a dome. Evidently I cannot learn from experience. Ashamed, I backtracked and spent another hour or two correcting the damage I'd produced in less than two minutes with the abrasive sheet.


Lapping = convexity, unless you're very careful about it. Although I believe Steve Knight developed a lapping approach that worked, but it wasn't trivial.

BugBear

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.