WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Planesky...

Posts

Planesky...

#1

Planesky...

Rob Lee

>Hi again!

Here�s the promised write-up on the Russian Plane.

As written before � this one has no cast parts; all components are stamped steel.

Firstly, the body is blanked and bent. Note the �beveled� sides where the 90 degree bend was done in two steps. Looks pretty good, avoids dinged corners, and doesn�t overstress the material. Steel thickness is 4mm. Top edges of the wings have been deburred, but still show shear marks from blanking.

Rear View - Body

Next � the frog is also stamped, bent, and welded to the sole. Clever, how the handle frame is part of the same stamping. Steel here (who knows why) is only 2.5mm thick. The bottom handle-plate is stamped and bent 4mm steel again, welded to the sole. Handle and knob are both Bakelite (or similar). The oval handle is secured with a weird bolt � FH screw visible on top � blind hex nut on the bottom (not tapped through). The handle is surprisingly rigid!

Frog and Handle

Front knob mounts on a welded stud.

Front Knob

The lever cap is also sheared and bent, with the business-end ground off (shown in red) to make the final taper. Steel here is 6mm! Also drilled and tapped for a capscrew. Lever cap is trapped under an 8mm bolt through the body.

Lever Cap

The blade is a hair over 1/8� thick (perhaps cold-treated in Siberia?? J ), and uses a stamped chipbreaker. Not sure exactly who the maker is, but marks on the body are:

Makers Marks

Overall � a very clever design � with a minimum of parts, and manufacturing processes. While I haven�t measured the sole � it�s pretty flat (for stamped and bent steel) � probably +- .005� either direction from the mouth. Only slightly crowned from side-to-side across the sole � much better again, than one would have suspected.

Tentatively dated as being 10-40 years old.

Cheers �

Comrade Rob.

Re: Planesky...

#2

That thing makes a Shelton look classy!

Roger Nixon

>The only thing I can think of is "Why?"

Re: Planesky...

#3

Re: Planesky...

Ernie Miller Topeka

>Is your frog bent or is it the picture? I bet it's better than a new Stanley and cheaper to make also. I bet they sold them things by the bushell.

Re: Planesky...

#4

Re: Planesky...

Rob Lee

>The frog is bent like the letter "c" - the blade contacts the frog at the top and bottom, as well as the base of the mouth. Very bizzare!

Cheers -

Rob

Re: Planesky...

#5

because quality was not a concern

Tom Sontag - St. Louis

>

Re: Planesky...

#6

Re: because quality was not a concern

Eric Lund

>And yet, it probably cost next to nothing to make, and after tuning was probably a reasonably useful carpentry tool. When you eat mostly potatoes and cabbage, because a steak costs about a month's pay, cheap is important.

Remember the old Mig 25 that landed in Japan, back in the 80's. Everyone commented what a POS it was, but its job was to be fast and go high. It did both of those. I remember people saying it had rivets that weren't flush. But, it had flush rivets where they mattered. Lack of money tends to make you very practical.

Cheers,

Eric

Re: Planesky...

#7

Good point

Bill Houghton, Sebastopol, CA

>In our rich economy, where we can afford to pay for mirror-polished plane bodies in places where the smooth doesn't matter, it's easy to forget there are places where function is first and pretty is less important than (a) fed, (b) warm, and (c) dry.

Re: Planesky...

#8

Re: OT - radar

paul womack

>Remember the old Mig 25 that landed in Japan,

I seem to recall everybody laughing like a drain because the radar used old fashioned valves, instead of proper modern transistors, and then stopping laughing when they realised it was damn near EMP proof.

more info..

BugBear

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.