Re: Mechanized back flattening
Lyn J. Mangiameli
>I have tried mechanized means of back flattening and have always found them to cause more problems than less. For one, with most items, the entire back can't be flattened, which makes any future back flattening (and removal of sharpening burrs) more problematic. Second, as you have found, even a slight bit of momentary misalingment can ruin you attempts to acheive a flat back and require a lot of time to correct. The latter problem could be minimized if not eliminated with a proper jigging system, but at present no one offers one (I did toss out an idea for one to Rob for the LVPSS, but I don't know if they will pursue it or something like it).
My recommendation is similar to one of the earlier replies, namely that you obtain one or two very course stones. My experience has been that many blade backs are far more out of plane than one would expect, and it takes some serious metal removal to get them to a point where one is refining the surfacer, rather than flattening it.
My standard procedure is to start with a 1000 waterstone, and take a look at the pattern it leaves on the back. If the pattern suggests that the blade is going to require much flattening, I immediately drop down to a 100 Shapton stone to get the back flat quickly and efficiently, and then go back up through the stone ranges to refine the surface. In my case this might be 100, then 200 or 320, then 1000, then the finer stones.
I think you will find that having just one efficient coarse cutting stone like the Shapton 100 will remove the tediousness form flattening the backs of all but the exotic steels (A2, M4 etc.).
I suspect that diamond slurries my be equally efficient for these purposes, using much the same grit ranges, but I just have less experience with them than I do with waterstones.