WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Muscle versus electrons

Posts

Muscle versus electrons

#1

Muscle versus electrons

William Claspy in Cleveland

>Hi folks-

My buddy was over yesterday. He is a jack-of-all-trades, and a very accomplished one at that. He wanted to use my table saw to cut down two cabinet doors for a client's project. Once the doors were cut down, they needed a 3/8" by 3/8" rabbet cut along two sides.

He trimmed the doors to size and began to set up the saw to cut the rabbets. I suggested using a plane instead, and while he didn't scoff, he raised his eyebrow. So while he was setting up a cut on the saw, I took my #78 off the peg. Marked and scored the width of the first rabbet with a marking knife, set the depth stop on the plane, and had at it. He was still setting up the first cut on the saw.

By the time he had made the first two cuts on Door Number One, I had flipped Door Number Two around on the bench, adjusted the bench dog, and was scoring the second rabbet. He fiddled with the saw fence and depth of cut as the dust collector droned on and the saw whined its impatient song.

We finished our work at about the same time- I was just truing up the rabbets with my 073 when he brought his door over- which also need some cleaning up. It was no race, but simply one of those many indications of the suitability of hand work when doing "one off" work. And I was glad when we could turn off the dust collector and saw!

Cheers!

Bill

Re: Muscle versus electrons

#2

Re: Muscle versus electrons

Ernie Miller Topeka

>Good story Bill but is it brains or muscle?

Re: Muscle versus electrons

#3

Re: Muscle versus electrons

Davy Barr

>Muscle wins by a noise factor of about 80 decibels.

Re: Muscle versus electrons

#4

Re: Muscle versus electrons

Charles

>Once one gets used to no noise and no clouds of dust it wouldn't matter much even if the hand tool process took longer.

Re: Muscle versus electrons

#5

Re: Muscle versus electrons

dale M

>I agree. All that I can say is that using my Record 778 is the most enjoyable hand plane that I use.

No tear out, not a whole lot of concentration required. No winding sticks, no straight edge. Thick shavings, thin shavings it doesn�t matter. A quick clean up with a shoulder plane and your in business. Just plane old fun.

The biggest hassle is all those shavings that cling to your cloths.

daleM

Re: Muscle versus electrons

#6

Re: Muscle versus electrons

William Claspy in Cleveland

>I agree. All that I can say is that using my Record 778 is the most enjoyable hand plane that I use.

To be honest, I really prefer to cut rabbets with the woody moving filletster I have. But as the doors were some sort of a glued up, veneered "engineered" wood product, I decided to use the 78 instead. The woody really sings, and like you say about your 778, gives simple pleasure regardless.

And yes, I couldn't really care less if it took longer :-)

Cheers!

Bill

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.