reproduction construction philosophy
Bill Tindall, E. TN
>This is really a turning question, but the folks over here may be more philosophical and knowledgable about reproduction issues than the bowl art folks....
For many years I have lusted over a spool bed I saw in a picture (and reproduced by a local periode furnitur maker) and after a year of occasional practice I think I have acquired the spindle skills to make it. Nine of the easiest 27 spindles are already made and the end is near, (ha, ha, ha).
I presume that sand paper was not invented when this original was turned and my questions(s) involve the finishing of turned items in days of old. Historically, flat surfaces were planned and/or scrapped flat and smooth and they look good to me if they don't have torn out places or obvious ridges. What was done on spindles? With the slow speed lathes of the day the turned surfaces could not have been of the same quality as a planned flat surface. Were they additionally smoothed in some way? Or, upon close examination do they have the occasional tool mark? (In this part of the world I can't bop down to the neighborhood museum to check out a 19 century spindle)
I don't strive for historically accuracy in a reproduction. As a matter of fact I have done little reproduction work. There are what I consider design errors in this piece which I will not reproduce. However, I have a thought that I might want to reproduce the look and feels of the old piece. I can certainly sand all the spindles to a perfect finish and it will look like a new bed. I don't intend to allow lumpy coves and beads, but what I mean is that a finish "off the tool" is not going to be the same as that same spindle sanded to 320 grit.
Any thoughts or advice?
