WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Thoughts on bed frames

Posts

Thoughts on bed frames

#1

Clint Searl

Thoughts on bed frames

Clint Searl

** Beds stay in place for a long time, so flat-packing for a move is unimportant.

** Box springs are unnecessary and cost a few hundred

** Whatever the mattress rests on gets hidden by a spread

** A footboard serves no structural function

** The headboard does not have to be attached to the frame, and if it's separate, there's unlimited design options

** Should be kid proof and allow for storage underneath

The approach I've taken on about a dozen examples is to construct a simple platform out of 2x6 framing lumber and OSB, dimensioned to the size and thickness of the mattress to stand at the desired height (24" for me). It can be built in the morning and slept on that night. Headboards have been wood, and once an iron gate, attached to the wall with cleats or even lagged into the studs.

A single bed on one frame, and queens and kings on a pair of frames


Re: Thoughts on bed frames

#2

some disagreement

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

Beds stay in place for a long time, so flat-packing for a move is unimportant.

The first bed I ever built when we were first married and had no furniture was made from half lapped 2 x 4's and 4 x 4 pallet skid legs, much as you describe. It did in fact get moved from MN to Buffalo and Buffalo to TN on the top of the car. But when I built for more than function.....



....I expect this bed to be moved. To accommodate moving it is assembled with bed bolts.

A footboard serves no structural functionI think you would agree that it does for many styles of bed and all traditional styles.

Re: Thoughts on bed frames

#3

Re: Thoughts on bed frames

Ralph Lipeles

Dovetails for the legs seems like effort that is not necessary. I would have used 4x4's held in place with 2 or 3 screws.

Re: Thoughts on bed frames

#4

Some different thoughts

John in NM

I'm going to disagree with four of your thoughts in particular, however, my intent is to provide another outlook more that to say "wrong, wrong, wrong!" I think everyone's outlook tends to be limited by their own experiences if they allow it to be - many people do because that is far more comfortable than to be drowned by the many options available to them. So don't take my disagreement to be saying "wrong".

First off, many people move. Many people move many times. Many people consider furniture they've built or their family have built to be valuable and want to keep it for generations. I design for the convenience of moving stuff, I've done a lot of moving.

2 and 3 I agree with whole heartedly.

4 & 5 are only true if you design them to be true - such as was done with the metal frames the store sells you at exorbitant cost like the box spring. One need not design things in such a way as to require a foot board, but a foot board can in fact be structurally necessary. One big advantage to the traditional head/foot boards and posts all held with M-T's and bolts is that its very easy to move since it can be disassembled. As I said, many people move.

6 - yeah, whatever. I hate under bed storage personally. I prefer a vast, open expanse under there so that the cat can't hide effectively when we are packing to move.

To each their own. Your preferences formed by your own experiences have probably served you quite well, as have my very different ones. That's the great thing about these kinds of forums, people get to sample the preferences of others without having to go through the experiences that formed those preferences.

Re: Thoughts on bed frames

#5

Clint Searl

Re: some disagreement

Clint Searl

That's a dandy piece of work that argues successfully for a footboard.

Another exception:

Re: Thoughts on bed frames

#6

Clint Searl

Points well taken.


👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.