>We recently did a complete kitchen makeover. The new cabinets are cherry with a medium (not real dark) finish. SWMBO doesn't like the cherry table I made several years ago (too much cherry now) and wants something different.
She has vetoed pine and I have vetoed Alder. Does anyone have a suggestion for a wood that would compliment the new cabinets?
>I vote ash. Economical, relatively lightweight and very durable. The grain and coloring will also contrast with and complement the darker cherry cabinets.
>To me the choice of woods to complement existing furniture or built-ins is governed by the totality of the room setting. Contrasts are not intrinsically bad, so an open-pore or light-colored wood like ash, as Jason suggested, could be okay. I draw the line along the red-brown continuum. I don't personally care for red-hued woods alongside brown-hued woods. (Ash is on the brown spectrum. Cherry is generally along the red, though with stain it can appear quite brown.)
On a more absolute note, I prefer darker hues for dining tables, probably because they are more formal. If this table is in a breakfast nook adjacent to the kitchen, I'd say that light would be alright. If it is likely to be more of a dining table, go for a darker wood that contrasts subtly with your cabinetry.
Subjective advice is just that. Try finishing some actual samples and discuss it with your wife.
>I agree with Theresa. Maple, carefully done, contrasts nicely with Cherry. Another wood, very, very carefully done, is Mahogony - but keep the redness under control.
>Google 'kitchen table' and find a couple of dozen pics, let her look at them and tell you what she likes and doesn't like - at least that's what I did.
I'm making a table out of walnut, but I've got a dozen of so pieces of scrap experimenting with light/dark, contrast between heartwood and sapwood - or the lack of it, redness, etc. I'll let her pick which she likes best.