Re: What's the difference?
Mike Sloan
>I have both a cyclone (Oneida 2HP Commercial), and an older two bag (felt bag) dust collector. The cyclone works much better.
While a canister system would be much better than my old two bag system, there is still a fundamental system engineering difference between the two types of system that would typically help the cyclone perform much better.
In the cyclone system, the motor is after the cyclone, hence air is being sucked through the cyclone, and there is a lot of vacuum pressure inside of the cyclone. As a result, any leaks in the dust storage and collection system actually leak air into the cyclone, and the dust in the cyclone and in the storage bin tends to stay there.
On a bag system, the bags are located after the motor, hence all of the dust collection and storage part of the system is pressurized, and the pressure tends to try to force dust out of the system, so unless you get a perfect seal, you leak a lot of fine dust.
Also, the bag system blows air into the collection bin, which tends to stir up more dust than in the cyclone (my theory).
One of the implications of this difference is that the cyclone removes almost all of the dust before the air passes the motor and goes to the filter, while in the bag system all of the dust is on the same side of the motor as the filter, hence (I believe) the filter on a bag system will get clogged up much faster than on a cyclone system.
Overall, I think that the cyclone does a much better job of containing the fine dust.
Mike