Re: Shellac follow up
It seems extra expense and effort is being devoted to avoiding the most convenient solvent- 50/50 methanol/ethanol available everywhere. Just considering the performance of this mix, what is its disadvantage that has been revealed by comparing it to 95/5 ethanol/water or 100% ethanol?
I switched to isopropanol after reading a comment by Bill Anderson, appended to a post by Chris Schwarz. Bill is a planemaker, tool historian, and former EPA scientist (not sure what his area was). Here is his comment in full:
Chris, after my bone marrow transplant, I have made a great effort to eliminate high VOC solvents from the shop. As you mentioned, DNA is a poison because of the methanol in it. Everclear is also a poison but is a socially acceptable one. These alcohols were easily metabolized to aldehydes which are very reactive to proteins and nucleic acids. I use 99% isopropanol. This has one more carbon than ethanol, so evaporates just a bit more slowly. It is sold in pharmacies and grocery stores (I get it from bulkapothecary.com) and is generally regarded as safe (GRAS)–note the use on babies butts! The advantage of isopropanol is that the solubility of shellac in it is no different at the levels we use (0.5 to 2 lb cut), and because of the lower volatility, the flow out of brush marks is very improved. A friend in Arizona emailed me yesterday saying that he is still able to shellac, though only in the am!
So summing up from Bill, Chris Schwarz, and others, it seems the main knock on the hardware store (usually Kleen Strip) brands are that they're (1) not as good at dissolving the flakes; (2) are more toxic; (3) have short open time and poor flow compared to isopropanol.
I haven't done enough research to confirm nos. 1 and 2, but as I said earlier (and B.T. has confirmed), no.3 definitely seems to be true.
P.S. So pleased we can now insert hyperlinks!