WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

desk on desk

Posts

desk on desk

#1

desk on desk

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

Well, actually table on desk but it looks like desk on desk.



Finally got the myriad of joinery and other necessities done on the parts and glued it up. 18 joints come together at once. I always glue up a case all at once so I can ensure everything comes together as planned and adjust the whole assembly as needed.

If a case comes up square it makes fitting drawers much easier. Hence, I spare no effort in getting the dovetails and M&T right. Juiced up the sliding joints with liquid hide and slide the parts together. Squooze it tight with clamps and checked diagonals. It's on the desk because the desk is a reliable flat surface. (my bench has had a hump in it for decades. I'm waiting for David to visit and flatten it. In the mean time it's the desk for glue ups)

When checking for square a square can be misleading. If one of the parts is even slightly bowed squaring with square will drive one bats trying to figure why a side if off one way and when measure on the opposite side it seem off another.

Measuring diagonals is the way to go. So how did it do? 13061 mm by 13060.5. Good enough.

Re: desk on desk

#2

Well Done!


Re: desk on desk

#3

correction

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

that would be 1361 mm, a much more reasonable sized table :(

Re: desk on desk

#4

Re: desk on desk

David Weaver

like the adaptation. As I recall, your bench is deep - that leads to a sore back planing a hump out of a bench.

When I was a kid, we built R/C airplanes on what was I believe a hollow core door (can't remember now). They weren't quite as flimsy back then, at least not the decent ones.

Went home to my mother's house about a decade ago and she'd gotten a big long desk with file cabinets under it and a nice table cloth over the top. I lifted the cloth, and it was nothing but R/C door on top of two short file cabinets!

Sometimes other things work better than "the right thing".

Re: desk on desk

#5

Re: correction

Warren in Lancaster, PA

Last night I thought, "Let's just see how many people know the metric system."

Re: desk on desk

#6

passing the first test...

David Weaver

...the first test most of us probably have to pass is not just skimming posts for information that we find useful. I saw those numbers skimming and thought "zip code" and lacked the curiosity to look further.

Reminds me of something adam carolla says in his bit on "language of losers". His employees will neglect to check something, and then say "they missed it because they didn't triple check", implying that they made an effort when they made none.

He will call them out and say "be honest - you didn't single check. If you single checked, you wouldn't have to use words like "triple check"" in the first place.

I forgot to triple check all of the details in bill's post. Besides, it's only a little over 42 feet....

Re: desk on desk

#7

no, no

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

my bench is only a fraction of one yard wide. "One" , a small number. It will be easy for you to plane it flat with no back pain. It's just soft poplar. (whoops is that my nose growing...... :D Free ice tea and lodging.

Re: desk on desk

#8

Re: no, no

David Weaver

so, it's dirty hard maple and an inch high in the center and nailed. :)

Re: desk on desk

#9

details

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

The back rail is M&T with a double tenon because of the height. Top rail dovetail, bottom rail double M&T. Stretcher simple M&T. Top to be fastened on with pocket screws.

Re: desk on desk

#10

Re: no, no

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.

It really is poplar. I'll clean it before visit. Unicorning buff supplied on site.

Re: desk on desk

#11

Re: no, no

Jérôme

... with sand burried in the mass.

Re: desk on desk

#12

Heresy

Jim Matthews

"Top to be fastened on with pocket screws."

It's not in Roubo, so it's not real woodworking.

Re: desk on desk

#14

Re: passing the first test...

Bruce McCrory

I never could understand why metric(ers) insist on stringing out a half dozen digits for distance. We're talking one meter; maybe, 13 meters in the error. But, 13061mm? Which I see (and, more) all the time.

No wonder they never use dekameters.

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.