Re: getting to the same end with modern steel
ThomD
>"I have had a knife maker, not smitten by things oriental, make a convincing case that what was good for a sword steel is not best for a knife, or probably a chisel."
That is true, but what happened was they banned the manufacture of swords and the folks who made those adapted to other edged tools, not just woodworking tools. That went on for 150 years till today. There was never a "samurai sword", but rather the hotly held secrets of many craftsmen fighting it out in more than a marketplace, and then on to tools. So the good would rise to the top, and the bad would fall off. The chisels and planes are not made the exact same way as the swords.
"And I have had people tell me about feats done with Japanese swords that I don't think would stand up to scrunity by Mythbusters. For example, cutting a gun barrel through. "
Ever watch a western? I would be loath to judge real shooting by that standard either. Samurai swords are not designed to cut barrels and I am sure that is largely impossible. Nor was there a social meeting equivalence between gun shooters and Samurai. On the other hand asian guns are sometimes made of wood or perhaps bamboo, so at some time, someone probably did cut a gun in half.
"Which reminded me of a story my Sargent told a long time ago of a duel in the Pacific islands between a motivated sword bearer and a BAR. Lead beat steel."
There was an incident on Guadacanal, I think, where a fairly large formation of swordman, hundreds I believe, were moved down by fixed machineguns. If Letters From Iwo Jima is to be believed, that may have more to do with a desire to die in battle than to kill the enemy.