Re: Smoother Sharpening Question
Adam Cherubini
>I think a smoother should have a radius to its edge to avoid plane tracks, or "gutters" as Moxon said in 1680-something. It just seesm liek foolishness to plane in the tracks then scrape them out. I've never heard of anyone actually recommending that approach.
I did hear the rep from LN (Deneb) say he found if the smoother was set fine enough it didn't leave tracks (or they weren't noticeable).
I think the thing to keep in mind with this issue is that we don't all achieve the same surface quality. You're not comparing 3 different methods that produce the exact same results. So which you choose depends on your expectations.
I like planes that remove a good bit of wood and I'm happy with rougher surfaces.
To camber a plane iron, I establish the radius with a grinder, placing the blade edge on. It does make me a little sick. Depending on the grinder I sometimes smoothen the ground edge- I think this helps. Then I redo the bevel/bezel with the grinder. Now if you haven't got a grinder, you can use a blue zirconium belt sander belt on glass. This is obviously slower, but its surprising how quickly it will cut. You can easily overheat a blade on this stuff so use caution.
I know guys advocate a really really shallow radius. Pretty sure DC does this by just placing more pressure on each corner for a few strokes. My guess is he's in the .001" shaving camp. My wooden planes can do that. With the sort of camber I've got, that resulting shaving may be less than an inch wide. That said, I don't think my surfaces are comparable to DC's- his are clearly smoother plus he works more challenging woods.
So figure out what you want to do and then do what you need to get it. There is no best way in this case.
Adam