Re: Why not have a "Bench Shots" section?
Michael Recchione
>At first reading, I thought, "Just what the world needs, another workbench page". But on further reflection, I think it's a really good idea. One of the things that makes it good is the opportunity to incorporate discussion on each design, and to have that discussion grow over time. When I was first starting to work wood, there was Rick Manderscheid's workbench page - at the time it was text based, with some ascii art, and was a collection of discussions saved from the OldTools list and maybe rec.woodworking. It was very helpful, but it was static - there was no way to add to it, so, while new discussions could refer to it, they never became part of it.
A growing, living section of discussions, with pictures, might be very helpful. Or it might perpetuate "paralysis by analysis". Either way, it would be fun.
I don't know about other folks, but speaking for myself: Discussions of new tools when I'm happy with my old tools don't turn me on so much - if I'm not in the market for a new plane or whatever, I tend to just skip discussions of this or that new product. But, for some reason, I never get tired of workbench discussions. Maybe because there are so many trade-offs and so many ways to approach the problem, so many constraints, etc. And maybe because, unlike most of our other tools, this is one we typically design and build for ourselves. So they tend to be very individual expressions of a particular woodworker's thinking.
Anyway, a long-winded way of saying "bring it on!".