Re: I agreed with Dunbar - mostly
thomd
>That whole thing about putting planes down flat has a certain whiff of unreality about it. Usually when I am working even if there wasn't a batten for the plane to rest on the bench with, or piles of shavings, you would actually have to do a pretty scrupulous job of cleaning to ensure there wasn't the few thou of surface fluff on the bench required to protect a smoothing plane edge. With really coarse set planes, there are plenty of shavings around to rest the plane on.
Another classic argument is the do you drag your plane backwards over the work or lift it one. I have done enough dragging not to believe the plane is damaged by resting it on a bench.
Which leads to chestnut 3 should one scar up the bench. I fall into the No! category. So I disagree with Dunbar on any laxity there. I think fine craftsmanship should teach respect for fine work.
I don't recall whether Dunbar mentioned it in his plane response, but one concern has to be safety. I have no problem working around my own planes on their sides, but give a seminar and you shake that habit real quick. Sure seminars are an unnatural situation for woodworkers in general, but they seem a bread and butter one for professionals these days. I know he has mentioned in the past that one has to overdose on the safety stuff, because sooner or later, every stupid accident you can imagine... Maybe that's an added advantage to the whole knights of the round table thing. Knights don't sue, at least not without loosing their social status.