Am I the only one who...
Bob Hackett(Mainely,Bob)
>views most every tool as a starting point?
Sure there`s the odd exception,such as Steve Knight`s planes that only need to be unpacked to be useful(well,maybe pull those whispy test shavings out of the throat first).Even the LN planes under discussion further down need honing before use although that`s a very minor point.
What brought this on was the thread below where folks are getting rather steamed about chisels being useful or not based on the handles and Adam`s appeal to someone to modify chisels for the masses.One of the reasons I buy old Swans,Whitherbys,etc is so I can put my own handles on them so I can determine things such as balance,handle durability/style,hoop/no hoop,fit to hand,etc myself.They`re handled only after the blade is configured to do what I need.
I guess what I`m trying to say is that till you start to at least modify your tools to fit you you will always be left with a tool that is at best ALMOST optimal but not quite.
Unless it`s a very rare and valuable collector`s item I grind,sand,bevel,retemper and flatten with abandon till it fits ME and the way I work.I was under the impression I wasn`t alone in this.
What say you?
Mainely,Bob
PS-In case you`re wondering,the valuable tools get traded or sold so I can pick up more rust to "hotrod".