Blade Taper in Handsaws - Have a Mike Handy?
Bob Smalser, Seabeck, WA
>
I'm not alone in contending that taper-ground sawblades are hardly Disston marketing gimmickry that some say they are these days....and that taper plus its attendant requirement for less set makes for cleaner, faster cutting.

So let's measure your best-cutting saws and see how many have taper ground in. Perhaps taper isn't just the providence of either Disston or "best-quality" saws in general.
Saws aren't the easiest critters to mike...especially with vernier mikes....so I used an average of three readings for each measurement.
Here's my three representative saws:
A Keystone 26" 7pt rip ...a medium or "fourth" grade saw similar to a Disston 7.
Back to Front Taper at Back: .0070
Back to Edge Taper at Heel: .0074
Blade Thickness at Edge, Heel to Toe: .0434-.0392
Disston #16 26" 5pt rip: One of Disston's "third-quality" saws.
Back to Front Taper at Back: .0150
Back to Edge Taper at Heel: .0031
Blade Thickness at Edge, Heel to Toe: .0369-.0282
Disston #12 26" 9pt xct: A "second-quality" saw, according to Disston.
Back to Front Taper at Back: .0137
Back to Edge Taper at Heel: .0030
Blade Thickness at Edge, Heel to Toe: .0363-.0325
The Keystone is an exceptionally tough, stiff saw that can muscle its way thru wet, gnarly oak with the best of them, but I find it takes more effort to use.
The #16 and the #12 are similar, although the larger heel-to-toe taper of the #16 surprised me a bit. What makes them cut easier than the Keystone, however, isn't the taper, as the Keystone has even greater taper...it's significantly thinner blades that average around .0345 instead of .0413.

If anyone has a modern PAX, made of fileable, tapered steel, I'd like to see how it compares with my old Disstons....fancy tenon saws alone aren't impressive....but perhaps there is a modern successor to what I consider to be the best handsaws ever made.

