Dave, I have both.
Bob Dodge
>Dave,
You asked if anyone felt that the Tite-Mark was worth double the price, well, I guess that depends on what you're specifically looking at. From a perspective of the materials used and workmanship, I'd say the Tite-Mark is definitely worth the difference.
I found much better heft and control, too. The knurling has been improved recently, and is much sharper, a more positive feel to it. I really don't care at all for my LV wheel gauge. Mind you, I have the basic model, and it's just not in the same league as the Tite-Mark, both from the materials used point-of-view, and usability. In fact, I thought I'd never buy another wheel-gauge again. Just not my cup-of-tea. I've used an old Stanley el-cheapo for 30 years, and for the most part, it's served me well. Not exactly "purty", but gets the job done. Often, I simply use my combination square, and a good dark pencil line. A very light touch, with a very sharp pencil. I find it easier too see the line as well. I find you need really good lighting when using the wheel gauge. Just my old eyes I guess.
Why did I go with a wheel-gauge? Well, the Tite-Mark just felt sooo good in the hand. I got a far better grip with this unit, since I tend to wrap several fingers along the knurled barrel of that gauge. You really get a sense of mass and control when handling it. This is one VERY well made tool. I'm still not 100% convinced that the smallish wheel will satisfy me though. That's probably just a matter of my lack of experience with that type of gauge. I just don't find the bearing surface large enough, especially at the end of the stroke, when only 1/4 of that wheel is in contact with the material.
With my old LV wheel-gauge, I tended to hold the gauge between my thumb and index finger, near the wheel. The knurled barrel on the Tite-Mark just feels a whole lot more positive from a control point-of-view. Now I use the thumb and first two fingers. Somehow it just feels a whole lot different compared to wrapping my fingers around the rod.
Bob