My experience with the #65
Derek Cohen (in Perth, Australia)
>Hi Tony
A few years ago now I had a yen to acquire a Stanley #65 chamfer plane. The only way I could do so was via eBay, and these seemed to go for prices that were clearly collector-related. I just wanted a working tool.
So I built my own chamfer plane out of some Jarrah scrap and an old Mathieson woodie blade (any blade could do, but this one does have the advantage of being thick and heavy). I had this inspiration about the design which involved laminating 4 pieces together (two central mirror-imaged bevels and 2 side pieces). The blade is attached with a butterfly-head bolt into a metal thread insert. The bed is 12 or 15 degrees, which gives me the option of a low cutting angle for endgrain or a HA blade for face grain. The whole thing took a couple of hours to build. There is a picture below.
Now that is only part of the story. Soon after I had completed the chamfer plane I won a Stanley #65 on eBay. It was complete (they are often missing the fences) but minus any Jappaning (so of little interest to a collector). I cleaned it up, even re-jappaned it, sharpened the blade, and .... What an anti-climax! After all that effort I discovered that the fences do not get close enough together to cut a bevel less than about 3/8" (I say this from memory), so it was useless for smaller width bevels (the #65 rides onto the fences - without this guiding the spokeshave at the end for the desired dimension, well, you may as just as well be using an ordinary spokeshave).
The #65 languishes on a shelf. Mostly bevels are cut with either the chamfer plane (or finished with it) or with a standard block plane.
Regards from Perth
Derek
