Adam's reading list
Adam Cherubini, NJ
>I was going to gild this lily, but decided to post sooner than later. I wanted to include ISBN's and check the titles and spelling, but what the heck...
The number one challenge facing today�s period woodworker is the lack of basic information that was instantly available to the 18th century apprentice and was completely indisputable (which doesn�t necessarily mean it was right).
Frustrated by the lack of information and by (what I have found to be) the necessity to dispute almost everything I learn in the mainstream woodworking world, I�ve sought good basic techniques and have attempted to share them whenever possible to save the next guy some frustration as others have done for me.
So for basic technique I recommend reading Moxon. So far, I�ve not found another text I can recommend unconditionally. Every other book I find has some questionable technique. That in and of itself should be valuable to some. Don't believe everything you read. Guy's write stuff that they don't or can't do.
Number two challenge is finding tools that actually function as they should. In this regard I recommend Dunbar�s �Restoring, Tuning and Using Classic Hand tools�, which I think is without peer.
Just for simple identification of tools: Salamans� �Encyclopedia of woodworking tools�.
For 18th century tools specifically:
�Tools: Working wood in the 18th century�
�The fascinating World of Early Tools and trades� (excerpts from "the chronicle" by EAIA)
Goodman�s �History of Woodworking Tools�
Mercer�s �Ancient Carpenter�s tools�
�The Tool chest of Benjamin Seaton�- is a reasonable look at a complete set of tools worth duplicating. There are only a few tools contained therein that I feel aren�t absolutely necessary. Similarly the tool chest is worth duplicating, but revisions are in order to accommodate molding planes with their irons in place.
Furniture making:
Green�s �American Furniture of the 18th century�. Ignore the technique section.
Chippendale's "Director"
To answer the question I was originally asked (roughly how I came to form my opinions about the nature of the 18th century shop) I recommend:
Google �John Head� and read the APS library page on the subject written by Jay Stiefel. Then Google �Jay Stiefel� and read all related articles, especially from the M.A.D.
Though seemingly tangential, Deetz� �In small things forgotten� and David Freeman Hawk�s �Everday life in Early America� will bring a better understanding of the mindset, culture and daily existence of our ancestors. As we BS about what they did or didn�t do, its important to recognize they were in many ways very different from us. These books make that case.
Second hand accounts of furniture, and 18th century shops are relayed to us through Watson�s �Annals of Philadelphia�. This is available in full on the web. Though long, its digestible in pieces.
One subject obviously missing here is the creation of a workbench. So far, I�ve not been impressed with the quality of information on this subject. There are at least three main portions of the problem:
1)There is a dearth of good info on using benches. Afterall, a workbench is a tool like any other. We shouldn�t be surprised there are techniques associated with it. Some of these techniques are never discussed (or I�ve never seen written anyway). This is a travesty that this community should remedy, IMHO.
2)Beginners need good workbenches but often lack the skills to build a good workbench. Here is where I�ve been held up.
3)The Workbench book and at least some magazine articles have, IMHO, misled more than they have helped. You might think that the benches shown in TWB (I can�t even write it anymore) would be at least functional for hand tool use, yet many are not. Very frustrating, as these short comings limit the potential work of the user. Nothing frustrates me more than when my equipment holds me back.
Obviously, and like you, my WW librbary is quite large. I think its good to read everything. Roy Underhill, Drew Langsner, Charles Hummel, etc etc. But I'm trying to keep my list short and to the point. If we really wrote what we've read and titled the list "suggested reading" people would dismiss us for the kooks we really are.
Don't skip Stiefel's footnotes.
Adam