WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Smoother Comparison

Posts

Smoother Comparison

#1

Smoother Comparison

Jonathan Peck - N.Y.

>Stanley:

Plane body - grey iron (soft, brittle) subject to movement as it ages

Frog - grey iron

Lever cap - grey iron

Blade - 01 carbon 0.080 thick

Chip Breaker - ? thin

Weight #604 - 3+5/8lbs

Lie-Nielsen:

Plane body - pre-stressed ductile iron or manganese bronze

Frog - manganese bronze

Lever cap - manganese bronze

Blade - A2 cryogenically treated toolsteel 0.125 thick

Improved Chip Breaker - 1/8" thick with 1 deg angle at contact point with blade

Weight #604 - 4lbs ductile iron, 4+1/2lbs manganese bronze

Overall LN:

Ductile iron is a strong alloy that will resist chipping around the mouth and

will hold it's shape better than grey iron under stress. The body comes

surface ground flat and square to .001 - Manganese bronze bodies are heavier

and come lapped to .0015 - Stress relieving ensures that the body will remain

flat and true. Manganese bronze frog and lever cap add weight. Improved

chipbreaker and thick iron add weight, machining provides excellent contact,

and may help reduce vibration. Lateral adjustment has no slop. Little to no

backlash in yoke. Overall, the LN is easy to set and holds its setting very

well. The planes overall design seems to allow the user to go longer between

sharpenings. Will handle tuff grain woods. A very tight plane that has a dense

feel that is solid and almost undescribeable, but likened to the sound a plane

makes taking a shaving when it's tuned correctly...wsssshhhht.

Overall Stanley:

Cast from soft brittle grey iron. Mouth often chipped and rounded needing filing. Sole

often needs lapping to get flat. Machining tolerances at factory unknown to

me. Lateral adjustment has slop. Yoke has backlash. Frog needs lapping and

fitting to bed. Chipbreaker needs work to get a tight fit. Blades are often

bent and do not bed flat. Overall, a very nice and affordable classic plane that can

be tuned to be a good go to performer.


img

Re: Smoother Comparison

#2

Re: Smoother Comparison

bob marino

>Jonathan,

Curious as to why you didn't also compare with the infill pictured?

Bob

Re: Smoother Comparison

#3

Re: Smoother Comparison

Dan Clermont in Burnaby

>I am with Bob. What about the Infill and the Bedock and while we are at it how about your Spier's Panel Plane.

Dan Clermont

Re: Smoother Comparison

#4

Re: Smoother Comparison

Jonathan Peck - N.Y.

>I was curious why after puting a LN blade and improved chipbreaker in a Stanley Bedrock why it wasn't like Cinderella's glass slipper. I still have alot to learn about tuning planes, but I think that Thomas LN has put the genie in the bottle for me. It would seem that his wonderful improvements as a whole are more than enough to compensate for my lack of skill.

regards

Jonathan

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.