WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Miter box saw question

Posts

Miter box saw question

#1

Miter box saw question

Ryan Selberg in Salt Lake City

>I have a Stanley 460 miter box (their largest), with a Disston 6" X 30" saw. It was sharpened by Tom Law, and cuts very well. However, I do find it a bit cumbersome with smaller pieces of wood. Would it be feasible to use a slightly smaller, lighter saw (i.e. 3" X 25" Disston, available at an online site) for smaller work, or is it just more expedient to find a smaller miterbox for such work? The 460 requires a minimum of about 22" to allow for the saw to be able to travel about 6" in cutting stroke. This question also assumes that smaller, shorter saws will actually fit the guide tracks. Is that a fair assumption?

Thanks,

Ryan

Re: Miter box saw question

#2

Jack Guzman from Maine

Re: Miter box saw question

Jack Guzman from Maine

>I'm not familiar with the 460 miter box but I have a 360A.Mine won't take a saw with a depth of less than 5 1/4" below the back.The teeth of a shallower saw cut into the sides of the guide.Saw box combos are plentiful and cheap on ebay.Get a smaller set for smaller work.I have several.A small one does most work. However I'm setting up the big one because the small one is just too light for some cutting.---Jack--still searching for the perfect miter saw

Re: Miter box saw question

#3

Re: Miter box saw question

Mike G.

>I used to have a Langdon that had two saws and two sets of guides. It was a little smaller than a 360A, but cut anything I put on it. I think I've still got the base but the guides are long gone as are the saws.

Mike G.

Re: Miter box saw question

#4

Re: Miter box saw question

Ernie Miller *Topeka

>I would consider getting a smaller box. it is just easier over all when doing small work to haave somthing smaller lighter and easier.

Re: Miter box saw question

#5

Depends some on what you mean by small *LINK*

Bill Houghton, Sebastopol, CA, the rain's here

>Ryan,

If by "small," you mean 1x1 molding or such sizes, then a smaller miter box will likely serve you - this was all I had for years, and I have yet to get to the restoration of the large ones I've picked up (too many projects, too few round tuits).

I once made a miter block for cutting stock 1/4" by 1/4" (6x6 mm for metric folk) with a hacksaw, and it answered quite nicely - the resulting picture-frame-around-a-small-picture fridge magnet is still going strong. I happened to have a piece of door-jamb stock to use, but would have gotten there with two pieces of wood glued together too. They work quite well. Alf's quite a slightly fancier one on her website, see link below, to give you an idea of what they look like.

Bill, reading too many British procedurals lately - "answered quite nicely??"


Thanks for the link, Alf

Re: Miter box saw question

#6

Re: Depends some on what you mean by small

Ryan Selberg in Salt Lake City

>Hi, Bill,

That is an interesting idea. I also realized I can use the 460 to help construct a smaller miter box, a "trough" style. Once the sides are attached to the base, I can use the larger saw to make accurate 90 and 45 degree cuts, which will be the most used cuts, then use a 12" or 14" backsaw for the actual cuts. Height of the sides can be matched to the smaller backsaws.

I appreciate the comments from everyone. Now off to the workshop to saw some wood!

Ryan

Re: Miter box saw question

#7

Kerf width

Bill Houghton, Sebastopol, CA

>It is important, I learned in making my miter block, to have a kerf width for a wooden box that's consistent with the kerf of the saw you'll use. This may be the biggest reason that home center wooden (or plastic these days, I guess) trough-type miter boxes don't work well: the pre-cut kerf is suitable for cutting the stock with a cat (I leave it to you whether I mean puddy-tat or Caterpillar D-9 - works either way).

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.