WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

Posts

Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#1

Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

Ron Smith

>I previously reported here on my great experience with the Anant #5; Excellent out of the box with minimal grinding and adjustment required. i said then i was going to get a #7 and that i was a bit concerned about trueness of the long bed. I was on the verge of ordering when i received an email from a fellow poster here who had had bad luck with the Anant #7 . . Returning two due to bad castings, and spending too many hours flattening the sole on the third one received. Now what! ?!

I considered a LN Low Angle #7 at around $300.00 . . . . And just could not stretch. I called the selling dealer of the Anant #7, and they said the castings and machining were Ok and planes were perfectly serviceable. I took a chance and ordered. Well, I was pleasantly surprised. The #7 is just as good as the #5. A little time with a diamond stone smoothing edges of the iron and chip-breaker, Checking the Frog adjustment, and flattening and sharpening the too-thin iron. I had one significant problem; When assembled the cut was poor and there was not enough lateral adjustment possible to set it right. Inspection showed a 1/16 inch wide elevated spot on the iron bedding surface on the left corner of the mouth. This was holding the iron elevated at that corner. A little judicious filing and all was well. I am not sure just how flat the bed is. I put it on a known flat surface and see-sawed a thin strip of cellophane back and forth the full length of the bed carefully feeling for unequal resistance. Then went over it with a Starrett 12 inch Square blade (the only thing I own which is pretty straight). Everything seemed OK. I remembered what Blood & Gore site said, something like; . ."#7s and #8s are NEVER flat but don't let that worry you." I put it to a very slightly out of true 2 inch thick board and snikker-snack . . . a few strokes and it was straight as a string. One-hundred and thirty buck and I have what for me is a perfectly adequate #5 AND #7. Oddly, that is about what i paid for my LN Small Chisel Plane . . Which Small Chisel Plane is so pretty it will NEVER see a piece of rough ol' wood.

*Not affiliated wid anyone, No financial or other interest, Your mileage may vary

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#2

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

kees

>What was the total amount you payed for the planes?

I have the LV LA jack plus the extra HA-blade $210 and don't need the other planes.

Just my opinion, but I am a non-collector

kees

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#3

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

paul womack

>I put it on a known flat surface and see-sawed a thin strip of cellophane back and forth the full length of the bed carefully feeling for unequal resistance.

That sounds like it requires care and thinking.

It's much easier and quicker (myth to the contrary notwithstanding), to just "dirty up" your known flat surface, and rub the plane on it.

Any high spots become dirty, and you remove them.

Recommended "dirt" is engineer's blue.

BugBear

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#4

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

Gil

>You can also do like auto body people do. Blue up the plane sole with a big permanent marker, then run the plane over the lapping plate. The Low spots are DARK.

-Gil

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#5

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

Richard H.

>Ron,

I read your review of the #5 and ordered one. I was dissapointed. The finish on the cast iron is rough and would require hours of fetteling to smooth. It is however flat. The mouth is out of square which requires extreme lateral adjustment for the blade. The thin blade is left with a rough finish, even more so than the plane body. The adjustment mechanism has a four turn backlash. The sides are out of square with the bottom.

I've read that the Anant is better than the Stanleys. I looking at both and I can't say that I would agree, fit finish etc. I will be returning this one and purchasing the LV LA Jack plane. I would'nt discourage someone from purchasing an Anant Plane but just keep in mind it will require some work. I would agree that for the price of $39.00, it's a decent value.

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#6

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

Tom Price

>Ahhh.. Stanley #7's are going for $40-$75 on Ebay. I mean if you are going to buy a kit plane might as well get one that was made right in the first place.

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#7

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

William Duffield, on the Cohansey

>The advantage of Prussian Blue, or whatever thin sticky dirt, on the known flat reference surface, is that you don't have to clean off all the clean spots and leave all the dirty spots on the plane sole dirty. Instead, you just mindlessly scrape off all the dirt.

With either method, you then repeat the process, until you are happy.

I think, in general, blueing the surface plate should get you to a lot flatter with a lot fewer iterations. I've done plane soles, blade and frog beds, turning and carving gouges, the other way, rubbing off the MagicMarker, and I know it can work if you are careful and persistent (or maybe just curmudgeonly stubborn), but if you are trying to get an outside surface flat, do yourself a favor and apply the blue to the surface plate.

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#8

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

paul womack

>...thin sticky dirt...

lovely phrase!

BugBear

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

#9

Re: Anant #7 - "Big Arn" (LONG !)

William Duffield, on the Cohansey

>It might be applicable to stains and finishes, too :^)

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.