Re: Interesting...
William Duffield, on the Cohansey
>Joel,
I also find it interesting, but I'm going to have to think long and hard about conic geometry. I don't think it is a general solution that allows anyone to achieve mindless sharpening of any gouge, but it sure looks like it can reduce the number of things you have to think about at the same time.
Bob,
Re, Side to side vs. Front to back: It looks like you should be able to push the gouge and jig in any direction or combination of directions that pleases you :^) I agree that side to side is not good, because the scratches parallel to the edge undermine its strength. OTOH, working in the diametrically opposed direction, one could easily end up with a faceted edge, instead of a smooth curve. I prefer to work front to back with a bit of a twist, In this manner, the scratch pattern is at maybe 60� to 80� instead of 90� to the face, so the scratches do not weaken the edge, and the edge retains a more or less smooth curve. This jig doesn't prevent that. Still, a few long strokes beat lots of short strokes any day, and this setup is definitely disadvantaged in that respect. (In other words, consistently using the whole length of the stone should get a better edge quicker than a jig that requires limited travel across the stone.)
Of course, the angles and smoothness still depend totally on the sharpener's skill, or the amount of time he wants to expend getting it just right. This jig, at least, should make it easier to get a consistent bevel angle.
Still, gouges are made in many different sweeps, and this jig only has one sweep, so one still needs a good deal of skill and stopping to check one's progress to get both the shape right and the edge refined at the same time.