WoodCentral Forums

Est. 1998 — 27 years of woodworking knowledge

Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

Posts

Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#1

Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

deanj

>OK Adam, you've done it, I'm in to middle of a bench building project and you have made my head hurt.

I am now pretty sure I don't need nor want a tail vise.

But, first a few questions.

The benchtop will be 8 feet long; I know longer would be better, but my shop isn't that large and 8 feet will be a big bench in that room.

The bench is morphing pretty much to a version of a Nicholson, sans the front apron with the series of holes. This means I will have a bench slave for edge jointing. It's too late to add the front apron, my base is build and there is no way to attach the apron as the legs are not flush with the front of the bench.

Tool tray is now out of the picture.

No tail vice.

Twin screw vise on front left.

Planing stop(s). Front left corner. Now, if I set them near the very far right corner I have a vice in my hip during plane operations. If I move it back somewhat my bench becomes shorter...

Perhaps moving the vise to the right hand side? But then it is a hip issue on longer boards...

Holdfasts -- Are there any available now days that are really going to set well? Garret Wade has forged holfasts, anyone use them? Where do I place the holes? Center of bench? Biased toward rear?

I will need to clamp a batten to stop the board from spinning during scrub operations, so a stop plus the batten clamped is the answer to the stock spinning issue. At least in 2 directions -- toward the stop and toward the batten. I scrub from both sides (both diagonals) currently, is there any way to stop that other direction of movement, or just no need?

I'm also thinking of a series of dog holes which line up with a few dog holes in the face vise...

(i.e. running from the front of the bench to the rear, rather than side to side)

My planing stop could become a batten with two dogs attached to the bottom. Slide this into the holes and presto plane stop. Positive side effect, my plane stop can move depending on length of board and I don't have a vise in my hip...

As a side effect I can clamp a board for cross grain operations -- dado etc...

Ideas, issues, rude comments?

Dean

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#2

Holdfasts

Gerry Doll

>Rockler has cast iron holdfasts for 3/4" holes.

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#3

My bench opinions (long)

Adam Cherubini, NJ

>Hi Dean,

Please don�t mistake my opinionated, close mindedness for wisdom. I just present my strong opinions and leave it to you all to sort out. Be sure to ask the other fine workmen here for their opinions. I�m not the best, just the most opinionated. And Brother, that�s the truth.

The bench is morphing pretty much to a version of a Nicholson, sans the front apron with the series of holes.

Just for the sake of clarity, a Nicholson bench minus the apron and with a thicker top is called a French bench. This was first drawn by Felibien in 1676 or so, later copied by Moxon.

It's too late to add the front apron, my base is built and there is no way to attach the apron as the legs are not flush with the front of the bench.

That�s a problem. You don�t have to have an apron, but it�s a huge advantage to have legs flush with the front. Here�s why:

1) What you�ll want to do is bore holes in the legs, insert holdfasts, then both support and clamp a board to the front of the bench for jointing.

2) You will want a sliding board jack that will ride on the lower stretcher.

Do your best to think through edge jointing. You should be able to handle boards 4-20 inches wide 12-100 inches long. If you can't, I recommend redesign. This is a critical function often overlooked. Woodworkers need straight, square edges to work from.

Twin screw vise on front left.

Consider very seriously using a crochet and placing the twin screws 20� apart (not center to center, 20� between them) straddling the rear leg. You can then place a holdfast in a leg hole as a vertical support, and clamp to the face with the twin screw. Do you have a copy of Moxon? Landis may have reproduced Felibien or Moxon in his �seminal� text (The Workbench Book).

Planing stop(s). Front left corner. Now, if I set them near the very far right corner I have a vice in my hip during plane operations. If I move it back somewhat my bench becomes shorter...

Planing stop should be in the far left corner. Place it very near the front, like an inch or two away so you can stick narrow stock. If your twin screw is like mine you can remove it in minutes. If it is on the right end and your bench is long (8� is long in my book), you�ll find you�ll be able to live with it most of the time.

Holdfasts -- Are there any available now days that are really going to set well?

Mine are Jorgensen�s from Highland Hardware. Get forged, not cast. Buy two. They are very nice and always grab for me. Bench material may effect grab. Frankly, I don�t get it. My bench and saw horses are beech. I�ve tried setting holdfasts in fir 4x4�s with no trouble.

Where do I place the holes? Center of bench? Biased toward rear?

Unless you want a swiss cheese bench, you really have to think this through. On the legs, you want a set of holes as near the top as possible to permit narrow stock to be edge jointed. I�d put them every 2 or 3 inches after that.

On the top you need a hole 1-2 inches to the right of the planing stop and 10-12 inches away (for planing 1x12�s). In this case the 1x12 will be resting against the holdfasts shank, which is good. For narrower stock, you�ll swing the HF�s foot over, set it hard against the bench, then bank your stock against that. I�d place another hole in line with this first one pretty far from the front, maybe 20� depending on the width of your bench to facilitate wide board work.

You�ll need a series of holes down the length of your bench, maybe every foot or so. Spacing could increase as you go right, since longer boards could use any of the holes to the left.

Bore as few as possible to start, then add holes as needed.

I scrub from both sides (both diagonals) currently, is there any way to stop that other direction of movement, or just no need?

No. Scrub in one direction only then fore plane with the grain more or less.

I'm also thinking of a series of dog holes which line up with a few dog holes in the face vise...

(i.e. running from the front of the bench to the rear, rather than side to side)

If your twin screw is like mine, this won�t work. You can�t get good pressure cantilevering off a screw with no other support. You could do that with a leg vise, but not a twin screw. Its just not structurally efficient. I did this with my first bench and it was a waste of time anyway, so I�d skip it.

As a side effect I can clamp a board for cross grain operations -- dado etc...

Its not necessary to pinch a board for dadoes. You can simply bank it against a pair of holdfasts. Anymore, I�m nailing fences on my carcasses when I cut dadoes. If you want to place a hand screw at one corner just to hold the work to the bench, that�s fine. But you won�t do it, because you don�t need it. The trick to working quickly with hand tools is challenging arbitrary requirements and skipping jigs and test cuts. We spend our time creating value, not preparing to create value.

Ideas, issues, rude comments?

Yeah, I have a few rude comments (at least I admit it). This is a big and complicated subject. Somebody should write a book about it! Why didn�t Scott Landis? Instead of taking pretty pictures, he could have interviewed real woodworkers and analyzed their benches, how they function, and how they don�t. Don�t show me a guy bragging about his bench when he doesn�t use it for anything but impressing customers and drinking his coffee. This isn�t rocket science and it also isn�t merely opinion. You need certain specific things for planing, you need things for jointing, you need things for dovetailing. There are a couple different ways of doing each. We could easily compare and contrast.

Adam

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#4

Show of hands...

Scott in Douglassville, PA

>This is a big and complicated subject. Somebody should write a book about it!

Ok, who here wants to see Adam write that book? Huh? Huh? I'll start off - my hand's up...

Scott, still wondering when he'll get to Pennsbury

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#5

Re: My bench opinions (long)

deanj

>Thanks Adam.

Trust me, I don't take your opinionated, close mindedness for wisdom. :-) It just made me stop and really think about what a bench is for.

Thank you for more food for thought. I'll mull it all over and see what comes out of it.

-Dean

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#6

Both my hands are up!

Frank Mutchler in Colorado Springs

>

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#7

Re: My bench opinions (long)

Frank Mutchler in Colorado Springs

>Adam, how can I get a copy of Moxon? By the way, what is it?

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#8

Jim in Burlington Ont.

I don't need a book

Jim in Burlington Ontario

>I need him to come over and make it. Nah but I have saved all your posts Adam thanks. At least I have my first bench to make the second one one. For thsoe who don't have a bench it's way more complicated using sawhorses and the likes. Jim who's still searching for the ultimate thread making device and I'll be all set.

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#9

Re: My bench opinions (long)

deanj

>

Consider very seriously using a crochet and placing the twin screws 20� apart (not center to center, 20� between them) straddling the rear leg. You can then place a holdfast in a leg hole as a vertical support, and clamp to the face with the twin screw. Do you have a copy of Moxon? Landis may have reproduced Felibien or Moxon in his �seminal� text (The Workbench Book).


Ok, this doesn't parse in my head. I have the 'seminal' text in question and will look later.

The twin screw straddling the rear leg?

Rear or 'right'?

-Dean

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#10

Re: My bench opinions

Ted Shuck, Centennial, CO

>Well said.

I think Adam makes me think more than anybody else who posts here, and improves my understanding tremendously for it.

Ted

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#11

Sorry. right front leg

Adam Cherubini, NJ

>

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#12

Moxon

Adam Cherubini, NJ

>"Mechanicks Exercises; The Doctrine of Handiworks" by Joseph Moxon

First published in 1687. Astragal press publishes a reprint of the "new" 1701 compliation.

Moxon is the first English Language how-to woodworking book in history. It is also the only English language book on the subject written before Peter Nicholson's "New Joiners'Guide" in 1799-1802?

Moxon was a chronicler, not a woodworker like Nicholson, or Roubo. He may be mistaken in some areas, and some descriptions are misleading. He describes a saw that sounds like a backsaw, but is probably a frame saw, since the back saw hadn't been invented in Moxon's time.

Its a helpful book, but does leave many questions unanswered. Frank, I recommend it.

Adam

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#13

Re: My bench opinions (long)

deanj

>Ok, more questions...



On the top you need a hole 1-2 inches to the right of the planing stop and

10-12 inches away (for planing 1x12�s). In this case the 1x12 will be

resting against the holdfasts shank, which is good. For narrower stock,

you�ll swing the HF�s foot over, set it hard against the bench, then

bank your stock against that.

If the stock is up against the holdfast shank, how do you avoid smashing your plane into it?

-Dean

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#14

Re: My bench opinions (long)

Alan Hamilton

>Frank,

I'm not Adam, but I too have a Moxon.

A "Moxon" is a book written by one Joseph Moxon, called Mechanick Exercises or the Doctrine of Handy-Works. I have a modern reproduction of the third edition, published in 1703. Moxon died in 1700, so presumably the book was written prior to that.

It's a discussion of the priciples of industrial arts of the seventeeth century, including wood working, blacksmithing, and others I can't remember right now. It's a great book and fun to read. It really makes me question how many of the wood working necessities really are necessary; and it surely convinced me I can do without much of the endless focus on the technical aspects of tools.

The only place I've ever seen the modern reproductions--or any other version--for sale, and where I got mine, is in Colonial Williamsburg. I've not found it on their web site, so I'm not sure how you might get one.

Alan

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#15

Re: My bench opinions (long) *LINK*

John, NY

>I found it on Amazon... little pricey for the hardback version but does seem to be available used in several versions. Hope the link works I've not tried one before...


Moxon Book

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#16

Re: My bench opinions (long) *LINK*

John, NY

>This is the cheaper paperback version available used.


Moxon Paperback

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#17

Re: My bench opinions (long)

Adam Cherubini, NJ

>Dean,

If the stock is up against the holdfast shank, how do you avoid smashing your plane into it?

Sounds like you have trouble with those dangerous things called forks too! Finally a kindred spirit!

See? Nothing is funny on the internet. Nothing.

I don't recall that being a problem. I think you just work around it. There's nothing clamped so you move the board around a lot. The bench like this at Pennsbury is low, so I find I sit on it to clean up a little spot like this. You could throw some scrap behind your board, which may be a good idea anyway to avoid marring the edge. You could consider using the farther hole and banking against the foot of the HF as well.

If you build this bench, you should document all your tricks. Since its a simple bench, its value to woodworkers everywhere is great. Imagine a great bench with no vises.

I was hoping to visit Williamsburg this fall and just sit and observe this type of stuff. I'd like to do the same in your shop after this bench is built. I'd bet much could be learned by watching an ingenious woodworker doing his job.

I saw a guy adjust a wooden plane by carefully smacking it on his workbench. Before that, I never conceived of adjusting a plane that way. I always used a wooden mallet.

Sorry I'm boring you with this OT dribble, but I find this sort of stuff fascinating. I guess that's why I work the way I do.

Adam

Come to think of it, I'd love to be a fly on the wall of many WC members' shops. I'll bet the next generation of WC woodworkers will post video clips from their shop cams. You'll be able to visit Michael Recchione's boy working at his Dad's bench! Boy he's a lot better than his Dad! I've been watching him for hours and he hasn't cut himself once!

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#18

Re: My bench opinions (long)

deanj

>Adam,



Sounds like you have trouble with those dangerous things called forks too! Finally a kindred spirit!


I have poked myself in the lip with a fork...



If you build this bench, you should document all your tricks. Since its a simple bench, its value to woodworkers everywhere is great. Imagine a great bench with no vises.


Well, the tail vise is not going on the bench. And I may rebuild the base. The top is still all rough lumber, so I can do as I please. Not sure if I can retrofit the base to have flush legs.

And it won't be a bench without a vise at all, the twinscrew will end up on it somewhere, and I'm leaning to the hook on the left and the vise on the right.

Having said that, I will try my best to document just how this thing works when it is finished.

Funny, part of the reason I started to rethink the tail vise was because my current bench is only 6 feet long and I am looking at dealing with 8 foot boards. No way I can even use my current tail vise...

-Dean

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#19

Using bench dogs

Alan Bierbaum

>This is partly in response to an earlier thread about a tail vice and holding unusual objects. The attached picture shows that a "standard" tail vise system can hold objects that are not rectangles. In the same line of thinking; a bench dog can simply be used as a planing stop by pulling it up slightly and pushing the board against it.

In short; I like my tail vice and I routinely plane stock at 1/4" thick using it.


img

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#20

Re: My bench opinions (long)

dave keay

>Adam your comments are indeed thought provoking could you post pictures of your bench?

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#21

Steve Kubien

Gosh darn it!

Steve Kubien

>Thanks Adam. I have been seeing the short-comings of my bench almost since I built it. Now you have to go ahead and make it sound sooooo simple to build a new one which will cost dirt to build and be fairly simple to boot! Oh heck, maybe I'll even make a prettier top while I'm at it!! Adam, you may have just ended my marriage.

On a more serious note (wouldn't take much, eh?) you have got the brain juices flowing. As Dave said, I would love to see some pictures of your bench from different angles.

And yes, someone show write a book. I've got both hands and my feet in the air nominating you. Hurry up and accept because the stench is getting raunchy.

See ya,

Steve Kubien - who may have fallen on his head too many times at aikido last night.

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#22

Also at Woodcraft

Mark Harrison -- in Sydney, Australia

>I bought the Woodcraft versions four years ago. I bought a pair of the large and the small. They work fine but they grip better with a thicker bench. My present bench is constructed from a solid core door which wasn't thick enough. I just glued and screwed some 2 x 4 underneath the existing dog holes and then re-drilled the holes all the way through. The holes are a little more than 3" long now.

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#23

Thanks, Adam.

Frank Mutchler in Colorado Springs

>

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#24

Re: adjusting planes with the "benchtop"...

John Aniano in NJ

>Adam,

You said: "(I) saw a guy adjust a wooden plane by carefully smacking it on his workbench. Before that, I never conceived of adjusting a plane that way. I always used a wooden mallet...

Yes, I have seen it and tried it too! Many bowmakers use very tiny metal planes (under 4" long) and they often adjust them using, you guessed it, by a sharp rap on the workbench or a small metal plate sitting on the bench for that very purpose. I still have not gotten into the habit of adjusting my bowmaking planes this way; it seems a bit like a brute force approach - I get more finesse using a tiny plastic-faced hammer.

Regarding the workbench questions - did anyone suggest a leg vise? I always extol the virtues of leg vises - they are my favorite! Another reason to have an apron flush with the bench legs, right?

BTW, did you post a picture of the toolbox you were working on at Pennsbury a few weeks ago?

Over and out,

John

Re: Was: Garret Hack's Bench, Now: Bench Q's for Adam

#25

Thanks, John!

Frank Mutchler in Colorado Springs

>I ordered a copy and should have it in a couple days. Appreciate your help.

👍 This page answered my questions

Your vote helps other woodworkers quickly find the answers and techniques that actually work in the shop.