Neader influced furniture construction
eric from maryland
>Slowey slipping into the neander thing I was struck with a problem I created on a bar top I am making. I wanted to make the top appear thicker so I added a strip of wood along the edge to give it the "thicker look" In doing so I reversed the grain to that of the main part of the top. When I came to smooth the edge I chose my new best friend -- a smoothing plane.
Well as you might imagine depending on which way I planed I got nice smooth curlies on one board but terrible tearout on the other.... Which leads me to my question
Given that in times past (aka before sandpaper) when the only choice for smoothing or shaping wood was to use a sharp blade, I would imagine that craftsman would not make my mistake but rather they would orient the grain to enable planing and shaping. I would also surmize that plenty of attention would be payed to this aspect of construction -- including discarding "questionalable" pieces of wood infavor of more predictable ones.
So my question is given this line of thinking and the demands of proper grain layout -- would this mean that furniture built in olden times was in some way better / stronger / etc. than stuff we build today ?
With sandpaper and power tools it seems that you can pay a lot less attention to choosing good wood and you can "force" bad wood to work
And yes -- I solved my problem the only way I knew how -- with a ROS and 80 grit paper
Thoughts ?