Re: PA Dutch molding query
Adam Cherubini, NJ
>Hi Bill,
The front edges of some PA Dutch pieces are double humped like a two humped camel. Short of making a plane to cut this profile (not an option) does anyone have a suggestion as to how to do this profile with electrons or not.
The double arch mold to which you refer is not typical of PA dutch furniture. It is characteristic of Wm&Mary furniture in general. It is always applied, as its purpose is to cover up joinery.
No one knows how it was made, but the examples I have seen appear to be scratched. The shape seems designed for a scratch stock.
Here's how I make it:
1) I smooth both sides of a 4/4X 6" or so wide board. I place the board on edge in my leg vise and try the edge straight.
2) I apply a side bead to the edge, then reverse the board applying a second bead to the other edge. Note that the board must have a straight secondary grain and must be uniform in thickness.
3) A small strip of wood sometimes remains between the beads. I remove that with a narrow chisel.
4) Lastly, I rip the molding off the board using my plow plane. I create a very narrow groove from both sides. The advantage to this approach is clear:
a) The plow is like a table saw with a fence (or so I imagine). You end up with a very accurate thickness of molding since the cut is related to the opposite surface.
b) the bottom or mating side of the molding is smooth and straight. Smoothing a sawn edge of such a small piece is a pain.
Was this profile typically applied or milled into the side and rail pieces?
Always applied. I use hide glue and a few headless brads (spregs) in the flat in between the arches.
Why are there not more (are there any?) books on PA Dutch furniture? It strikes me as Shaker-like, with a bit more elegance. As such I would think it would be a popular style to reproduce.
PA dutch is usually crude, poorly built (peasant built) furniture featuring (large) architectural moldings and sometimes curious surface work and milk paint. It generally lacks the refinement of English or Urban American furniture from the same period. I suspect you would find Wm&Mary furniture to have much more in common with Shaker. I suggest procuring a copy of "Worldly Goods" exhibit catalogue from the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
As to why its not more popular, I always figured it was because the few period pieces were insufficient to establish a market of collectors. Furniture from the revolution was extensively reproduced, and therefore remains available.
Shea's book, like many others like it, is not only frought with errors, but fails to depict typical pieces. Its just not scholarly work. In my opinion the best book about period furniture is Jeff Greene's book "American Furniture of the Eighteenth century". There are no measured drawings nor should there be. Measured project plans really cause more problems than they solve. Understanding how period furniture was made is really the only practical way to reproduce it.
Good luck with your double arch mold.
Adam