Re: Workbench LV twin screw vise
Adam Cherubini, NJ
>Regardless of the design of your bench or vise system, here's what I think:
The widest carass I've ever built is approx 20" wide. Working the old fashioned way as I do, its likley that's one or two wide boards.
Being able to clamp an 18-20" wide board in a twin screw vise is a serious advantage. A little cup can be clamped out, and it makes marking and sawing dovetails much easier.
I'm at a loss to provide sensible recommendations. I agree that a 30" wide bench is excessive and brings its own problems. We see big twin screw face vises, both left and right side, on period benches, but I'm not sure how convenient it would be to remove that vise in particular, and what you'd do for a tail vise then.
When we look at period benches (well, all of us but Scott Landis) we see several features in common. Their benches were long, probably 9'. 18th century rarely had tail vises. Flush aprons, or flush front legs, drilled for pegs or holdfasts (undoubtedly for jointing) are common. A hook or "crochet" was most typical in lieu of a face vise. A single planing stop and a few holdfast holes were strategically located on the tops.
A few holdfasts, a few clamps, and a little ingenuity, make it difficult to find a task these benches can't do well. As we increasingly depart from the traditional set-ups, one can only wonder if we aren't losing something.
Okay, I talked myself into it: Maybe you should think about putting that vise, max width, in your preferred face vise position. Just make sure you leave provisions for edge jointing. Maybe a wide drilled continuous apron ala Williamsburg (Peter Nicholoson's 1812 bench). I wonder if you could get an extra set of nuts from Rob Lee? Then you could move that puppy. Hmmm,
Just thinking out loud here,
Adam