Re: What's good for the economy?
John McGaw
The key is that Target and Walmart are no longer brick-and-mortar in the old sense. At best they are a hybrid, smaller than Amazon, but trying to keep their heads above water. I can't see where having a local physical outlet is that great of an advantage if you still have to order online or order in the store if what you want is not physically present. I buy a lot of stuff from Amazon for no other reason that that they are convenient although I do routinely search for items elsewhere -- then I take the total cost and delivery schedule into account and then buy where it makes the most sense to me. I have an Amazon credit card that gives (defined loosely) 5% cash back so maybe that biases me a bit but cheaper or quicker will still win me over if Amazon doesn't cut it.
Oh, and they do give a minuscule cut to WC the last I heard. At least I keep using the magical URL to get to Amazon.com when I do go shopping in hopes that Ellis is seeing something from it.
No matter how you look at it, retail is a brutal arena and when the fight starts the little guy quite often gets squashed so betting everything on the little guy will not win you much in the end.
But if Amazon were to become the sole supplier of a product there would be few incentives for Amazon to dink around with a new version of the product. I guess if an improved version of the product became available that would result in a higher volume and higher revenue Amazon might consider it, but if it wanted more revenue from the product it could just raise the price on the original version and be done with it. They are trying to give us anything we want to buy available to us at our front doors the next day (and even the same day for some items). As they get closer and closer to that goal it will become harder and harder for anybody to sell anything without going through Amazon.
















