Re: OT- Changing Brakes
TomD
When I looked into the allowable wear on my F-150, I was surprised how little it was. Because, by the time the pads wear, you are well into the rotor. I could imagine from knowing a little about machining that you couldn't clean them up without weakening them.
One thing that has happened to rotors is they are now hollow for weight loss (rotating weight is a killer), and up here in the rust belt, by the time you need to do a pad job, the inside of the rotor is flaking away anyway. It is probably fine, but it looks bad.
Here is the kit for a Camry, I can't recommend it (I'm a cheapskate, not a car guy), but I used the same manufacturer on my F-150, and 18 months later it still looks great:
https://www.amazon.com/s/gp/search/ref=sr_nr_p_89_0?fst=as%3Aoff%2Cp90x%3A1&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Acamry+brake+kit%2Cp_89%3AMax+Advanced+Brakes&keywords=camry+brake+kit&ie=UTF8&qid=1543189335&rnid=2528832011
It costs just over 50 to do the front on a Camry, which is the easiest one, and the one that wears the most. When I buy the parts locally, it costs me 500+.
I looked up the allowable wear on my F-150, and came across this hilarity from 2002:
"On brake inspection the dealer originally recommended replacing the rotors because they felt that there was not enough left to machine, but backed off when I balked at the price ($542, plus fluid flush at $140??!!)."
Or you could get new rotors at 16 bucks each, and the fluid is eternal so long as it doesn't boil or leak.
I think another reason for moving to these replaceable parts, is that brakes and mufflers were a sore point with drivers. Last two vehicles I have had lasted over 20 years together, and one is still going strong, and neither has needed a muffler. But in the day you could do several in the life of one car. And brake jobs are just so expensive. It only took moving to discs to make them user easy to do, and keep people's costs down in line with the general reliability of vehicles today.