It's a good thing to know..
Response To:
Agree wholeheartedly! ()

David Weaver
...but at the outset, I thought their uncharacteristic somewhat emotional post (for them) was out of antiscientist sentiment frustration.

I'm a little less confident that the desire to poke a finger in their eye and ignore their entire body of other work (they even published study information in ivermectin) is done with the hope of finding answers vs. poking in eyes.

But poking in eyes is popular these days.

So they've posted "we're back to 'we don't really know'" and my personal sense in recognizing patterns of things over time is if the initial answer isn't apparent, quite often, later explanations aren't solid either. I'm pleased to see that they revised (publicly) what they said initially, but recognize the difference between them saying they don't know vs. someone else proving that their initial statement was errant.

© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.