Hand Tools

Subject:
Re: Calling BS
Response To:
Re: Calling BS ()

joelmoskowitz
I was taught to buy wood in the rough, let it acclimate to the shop and then mill it. I have spent days milling lumber by hand. (not for a bunch of years though - my home shop is now a bedroom) But I have never worn out a plane and never will.
But if you were correct then how do you explain the ready availability of early 19th century wooden planes of all types - EXCEPT bench planes. The most common planes for milling wood are by far the least available survivors. This is even more remarkable because bench planes sold in orders of magnitude greater quantities than any of the specialized molding, rabbet or other styles.
I happen to own I think one late 18th century bench plane - a very long jointer by Gabriel. It not only is unusable because of so much wear and tear the mouth was repaired at least once.

By the way I don't even understand why this is controversial. It's not even that unusual to find old metal planes in great shape except for some rounding (through wear) on the leading edge of the mouth. No big deal but things wear.

I won't argue that in the normal coarse of events a modern woodworker will have less wear and tear on their tools than someone from a century ago, if nothing else the workday to day is shorter. And of course irons wear faster than bodies - you sharpen all the time I would guess - how much material do you lose each time? .002"-.005" (I have no idea) but it adds up. just for fun: sharpening once a day (conservative if you are dressing wood) 200 working days in a year (working only 5 days a week + vacations we are living high) 200 x .002 = .4" every year. With a usable iron length of about 2" every 5 years you would need a new blade. (Obviously your numbers might vary the calculation was just for fun)

Messages In This Thread

Light vs Heavy planes
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
not the direction I went *PIC*
5 1/4
Re: reframing the issue
Re: reframing the issue
Friction, and more
The experiment and conclusion are both confusing
Re: Heavy and light
The best case for heavy planes...
another factor
If you're trimming furniture...
At some point..
Inertia and figured wood
Re: Jim, what is Osae-gani? *NM*
Osae-gani
Re: Osae-gani
Note on fitting
Re:wedge fitting
funny...
Re: funny...
Re:wedge fitting
biases for the maker...
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
Not a positive contribution to the discussion
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
finding out who to listen to...
Re: Same
Old history
Shops using mostly hand tools..
Re: Shops using mostly hand tools..
Don felder's guitar...
Misprint?
cultural thing...
Re: Misprint?
Re: finding out who to listen to...
I agree...
Re: finding out who to listen to...
Turnover, newbies and FAQ
comment on teaching
If you get my drift...
Re: Light vs Heavy planes
new vs. old planes...
I like tools from Brooklyn
Re: I like tools from Brooklyn *NM*
Infills in the UK
I'm glad you commented.
Note on a modern infill
konrad's planes...
Re: I'm glad you commented.
what I've found...
Re: what I've found...
interesting that...
Re: Calling BS
I haven't seen it....
Re: I haven't seen it....
Re: I haven't seen it....
Re: I haven't seen it....
Re: I haven't seen it....
Truing Kanna
expanding on what jim said
Re: expanding on what jim said
Re: expanding on what jim said
Coupla thoughts
different methods of lapping and the bump
Re: Calling BS
Re: Facts, not assertions
Re: Facts, not assertions
I think we're agreeing...
Re: I think we're agreeing...
Re: Me too
Wood isn't indefinitely stable, either
Re: Calling BS
Re: Calling BS
Re: Calling BS
by the early 19th century
Re: by the early 19th century
It's not offered as ball court...
I miss Todd Hughes' contributions too *NM*
Re: It's not offered as ball court...
I'm guessing on parts here...
Re: Can't argue
Weight Comparison
more infill weights
Re: more infill weights
now there is a pearl of wisdom
Re: more infill weights
initial fitting...
one more follow-up comment.
Re: one more follow-up comment.
rosewood
Re: rosewood
© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081