Hand Tools

Subject:
The bevel

Wiley Horne--So. Calif.
Hi David,

Here’s a notion. It doesn’t rise to the level of a theory. Just a thought that occurs: Warren’s recommendation of the farthest setback that gets the job done, combined with the rounded bevel, have the effect of reducing friction between shaving and bevel. Bending the chip to a critical angle, rather than ‘breaking’ it. Minimize back-pressure by not letting the bent shaving become a ‘spring’ flexing back onto itself and increasing the pushing force required. He creates just enough friction and back-pressure to get the job done—note in Fig. 6 that the pushing force required at 8 thousandths is only 10% or so greater than ‘no chipbreaker’, and this is with a flat bevel rather than a rounded one. And yet there is concave wear below the chipbreaker at 8thou, showing that the chipbreaker is doing real work on the shaving.

Question: How does the above notion relate to the straightened shaving? I wonder if Warren is going for a straightened shaving, which would seem to require ‘breaking’ the chip, or whether he is trying to find a sweet spot just before physically breaking the shaving.

The picture I see, and maybe it’s incorrect, is that there is a continuum from ‘bend shaving’ to ‘bend to critical angle’ to ‘break shaving to produce straight shaving’, to ‘accordion shaving’—as the bevel steepens and the setback is tightened.

Wiley

© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081