Hand Tools

Subject:
Re: Print from 1905

Patrick Chase
This one actually clearly illustrates a common problem with the prior references. It's correct on the general idea, but wrong on a crtitical detail in a way that renders it less than useful.

Specifically, 1/64" is NOT a close set as it states, and actually won't do much to prevent tearout on difficult woods (at least not for thin finishing cuts). Somebody who followed this manual literally would conclude that the cap iron doesn't help very much, and resort to other mitigations instead. This is what I referred to in a prior post when I pointed out that many people were aware of the "lore" about double irons, but were wrong on the details.

In the same vein you can find an effectively infinite number of sources from the dark ages (90s/00s) that recommend setting the cap iron at 1/32" or 1/16" to "prevent tearout". Again that shows awareness that it may have prevented tearout at some point in the dimly-remembered past, but no real understanding of how to achieve it.

Some of your other references in this thread are of much higher quality, though.

Messages In This Thread

Planes; knife geometry specifications *LINK*
Re: Planes; knife geometry specifications
Re: Planes; knife geometry specifications *PIC*
Re: Planes; knife geometry specifications
Re: Planes; knife geometry specifications
Re: Strawmen
Re: Strawmen
Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: All screwed up?
Re: All screwed up?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Skepticism *PIC*
Re: Skepticism
Re: Skepticism
Re: Skepticism
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Who are the teachers?
Re: Strawmen
Print from 1993 *LINK* *PIC*
Re: Print from 2010 *PIC*
Re: Print from 1905 *LINK* *PIC*
Re: Print from 1950 *LINK* *PIC*
Integral Chipbreakers in handplanes *PIC*
Re: Integral Chipbreakers in machines *PIC*
Re: Integral Chipbreakers in machines *PIC*
Re: Integral Chipbreakers in handplanes
Re: Print from 1917 *PIC*
Re: Print from 1905
Re: Print from 1905
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Breadth of forum participation *NM* *LINK*
Re: Breadth of forum participation
Re: Breadth of forum participation
Stanley...anyone care to comment? *PIC*
Occasionally, someone thinks they have...... *PIC*
I wish I had a wheel..
Re: Occasionally, someone thinks they have......
Re: Occasionally, someone thinks they have......
Re: Occasionally, someone thinks they have......
Re: Occasionally, someone thinks they have......
Beautiful workbench Roger! *NM*
Thanks Mark.....
Perfection exists to be pursued not caught. *NM*
Re: Stanley...anyone care to comment?
Re: Stanley...anyone care to comment?
Re: Stanley...anyone care to comment?
Re: Print from 1993
Re: Print from 1993
Thanks William. *NM*
Re: Strawmen
© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081