Hand Tools

Subject:
ditto for turning

Bill Tindall, E.Tn.
I took a class with Alan Batty, a person that had worked in the British Trades all his previous life making "parts" on a lathe. One morning before class I took him a bun foot I had turned. It was good but something about it was not as good as the bun feet I had seen on old furniture. Alan chucked it in the lathe. One end had been sawed off its support and its center lost. No matter, Alan spun it up, bashed it a few times, while spinning!, and it miraculously centered itself. To this day I regret not asking-"how did you do that?!".

Alan took no more than 1/32 from part of the large diameter circumference, and adjusted one side of the cove, again by no more than 1/32, and it just popped. I have saved it for inspiration, and a reminder that I will never turn enough to get "perfect" at making turned objects.

Only a turner would notice the differences, so lack of perfection does not need to be an obstacle to making stuff that most everyone will admire. I am sure that Curtis Buchannan would be embarrassed by the spindles in his early chairs, from 30,000 spindle hindsight. Never-the-less, I'll bet their owners cherish them.

Which brings me back to the point, if you want hand tool work to be significant then the design needs to include some element where hand tool work matters- for example turning, carving & shaping, and inlay.

This is not to say that attractive design has to include hand tool work.

Messages In This Thread

What makes the "handtool" look?
What is the objective
Re: I don't really know
If you can't design then copy
Re: That is a line...
Re: If you can't design then copy
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Edit: incomplete thought.
Chamfers on rails and styles
comment
This is a line of thought often
Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Adam's goal, as expressed to me
Re: Where is Adam Cherubini ?
Re: comment
Re: comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Disagree
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment
printing..
Re: comment
I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: I'm wondering ...
Re: I'm back to what is the objective
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Not what I see *PIC*
Re: comment on comment *PIC*
Re: comment
Re: comment
Re: comment (touchy feely alert)
ditto for turning
Re: Tempted
Re: Tempted
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Easy question
Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
Re: Wrong question
A Riff on Derek's ideas
Re: we do it for ourselves
Re: we do it for ourselves - Nietzsche nailed it
Thanks Todd. *NM*
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Amish
Saw handles
Re: Saw handles
Easy... the eye of the beholder
You guys are way too negative
Perhaps...
Re: Perhaps...
Re: What makes the "handtool" look? Mistakes?
Re: What makes the "handtool" look?
Thanks gentleman
Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Re: Caring WRT Handwork
Where was "why bother"?
What doesn't result in a hand tool look *PIC*
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Re: What doesn't result in a hand tool look
Affectation Vs. Artifact
Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Virtue?
Re: Affectation Vs. Artifact
You said it well *NM*
Sorry, didn't read your post very well
David Pye's thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts
Further thoughts
Re: Further thoughts
Re: David Pye's thoughts - Just not true though
Visual vs. measurement
ICBM gyros
Pye
© 1998 - 2017 by Ellis Walentine. All rights reserved.
No parts of this web site may be reproduced in any form or by
any means without the written permission of the publisher.

WOODCENTRAL, P.O. BOX 493, SPRINGTOWN, PA 18081